Bone Fractures with Sodium-Glucose Co-transporter-2 Inhibitors: How Real is the Risk?
Edoardo Mannucci1,2, Matteo Monami3
1Department of Biomedical, Experimental and Clinical Sciences 'Mario Serio', University of Florence, Florence, Italy. edoardo.mannucci@unifi.it.
Abstract:
This article succinctly summarizes the available evidence on the risk of bone fractures with sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors. The US Food and Drug Administration has strengthened the warning for canagliflozin related to the increased risk of bone fractures, and added new information about decreased bone mineral density. The agency has also said that it will evaluate the risk of bone fractures with other drugs in the sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitor class. Increases in parathyroid hormone levels and decreases in 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D levels have been postulated as possible mechanisms. In contrast, some studies with dapagliflozin have shown no effects on bone health. Because a consensus has not been reached, we believe that an expert opinion on how to interpret the available evidence would be of great benefit for clinicians.
Insights
Sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors may increase bone fracture risk, with canagliflozin showing decreased bone mineral density. Further evaluation is needed for this drug class due to conflicting evidence and unclear mechanisms.
Area of Science:
- Endocrinology
- Pharmacology
- Metabolic Diseases
Background:
- Sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) are used for type 2 diabetes.
- Recent FDA warnings highlight potential bone fracture risks associated with canagliflozin.
- Concerns exist regarding the impact of SGLT2i on bone health, necessitating a review of current evidence.
Purpose of the Study:
- To summarize existing evidence on the association between SGLT2 inhibitors and bone fractures.
- To discuss potential mechanisms linking SGLT2 inhibitors to adverse bone effects.
- To provide expert opinion for clinicians navigating the conflicting data on SGLT2i and bone health.
Main Methods:
- Review of available scientific literature and regulatory communications regarding SGLT2 inhibitors and bone fractures.
- Analysis of studies investigating effects on bone mineral density and biochemical markers.
- Synthesis of evidence to inform clinical interpretation.
Main Results:
- The US FDA strengthened warnings for canagliflozin due to increased fracture risk and decreased bone mineral density.
- Potential mechanisms include altered parathyroid hormone and vitamin D levels.
- Some studies on dapagliflozin show no adverse effects on bone health, indicating class variability.
Conclusions:
- The evidence regarding SGLT2 inhibitors and bone fracture risk is conflicting and not fully conclusive.
- Expert interpretation is crucial for clinicians managing patients on SGLT2 inhibitors.
- Further research is warranted to clarify the long-term effects of SGLT2 inhibitors on bone metabolism.
Related Concept Videos
Oral Hypoglycemic Agents: Biguanides and Glitazones
Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4 Inhibitors
Oral Hypoglycemic Agents: Glinides
Glucose Transporters
Facilitated diffusion-glucose transporters (GLUTs) are encoded by the solute-linked carrier (SLC) family 2, subfamily A gene family, or SLC2A. The 14 GLUT protein members are distributed into three classes:
Oral Hypoglycemic Agents: α-Glucosidase Inhibitors
Acarbose and miglitol are...
Oral Hypoglycemic Agents: Sulfonylureas


