Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 12, 2026

Applicability Analysis of Assessment Methods for Morphological Parameters of Corroded Steel Bars
Published on: November 1, 2018
Applicability domain: towards a more formal definition
T Hanser1, C Barber1, J F Marchaland1
1a Research Group, Lhasa Limited (UK) , Leeds , UK.
Abstract:
In recent years the applicability domain (AD) of a prediction system has become an important concern in (Q)SAR modelling, especially in the context of human safety assessment. Today AD is an active research topic, and many methods have been designed to estimate the adequacy of a model and the confidence in its outcome for a given prediction task. Unfortunately, the wide spectrum of techniques developed for this purpose is based on various definitions of the concept of AD, often taking into account different types of information. This variety of methodologies confuses the end users and makes the comparison of the AD for different models almost impossible. In this article, we demonstrate that AD is not a monolithic concept and can be broken down into three well-defined sub-domains assessing confidence at the model, prediction and decision levels, respectively. By leveraging this separation of concerns we have an opportunity to clarify, formalize and extend the definition of AD. We propose a framework that captures this new vision with the aim to initiate a global effort to converge towards a common AD definition within the (Q)SAR community.
Related Concept Videos
Rules for Defining Functions
Kirchoff's Rules: Application
When applying Kirchhoff's first rule, the junction rule, label the current in each branch and decide its direction. If the chosen direction is wrong, it will have the correct magnitude, although the...
Formal Charges
Combining Functions
Indeterminate Forms and L’Hôpital’s Rule
The Precise Definition of a Limit

