Planktonic protistan communities in lakes along a large-scale environmental gradient
Maryia Khomich1,2, Håvard Kauserud2, Ramiro Logares3
1Section for Aquatic Biology and Toxicology, Department of Biosciences, University of Oslo, PO Box 1066 Blindern, 0316 Oslo, Norway.
FEMS Microbiology Ecology
|November 10, 2016
Summary
Microbial eukaryotes in 74 Scandinavian lakes reveal diverse phytoplankton and parasitic taxa. Diversity gradients were linked to geographic distance and regional species pools, not local environmental factors.
Area of Science:
- Aquatic microbiology
- Eukaryotic diversity
- Limnology
Background:
- Eukaryotic microbial diversity in inland waters is poorly understood.
- Comprehensive analysis of eukaryotic diversity in low-productivity lakes is needed.
Purpose of the Study:
- To comprehensively analyze eukaryotic microbial diversity in 74 low-productivity lakes across southern Scandinavia.
- To investigate the relationship between diversity, community composition, and spatial/environmental variables.
Main Methods:
- 18S rDNA amplicon sequencing was used.
- Analyzed 74 low-productivity lakes along a longitudinal transect.
- Classified eukaryotic diversity into 1882 operational taxonomic units (OTUs).
Main Results:
- Detected wide diversity of pelagic microbial eukaryotes, with high OTU richness in phytoplankton groups.
- 53.6% of OTUs were autotrophic; 19.4% of heterotrophic OTUs were parasitic.
- Community dissimilarity increased with geographical distance; diversity gradients were explained by spatial structure and regional species pools.
Conclusions:
- Spatial structure, rather than local environment, significantly influences protistan diversity and community composition in these lakes.
- Longitudinal gradients in diversity are likely driven by regional species pools and landscape productivity differences.
Related Concept Videos
Diversity of Protists IV
1.8K
Amoebozoa represent a diverse group of terrestrial and aquatic protists that utilize lobe-shaped pseudopodia for locomotion and feeding. This characteristic differentiates them from the Rhizaria, which possess threadlike pseudopodia. The primary classifications within Amoebozoa include gymnamoebas, entamoebas, and the plasmodial and cellular slime molds. Phylogenetic evidence indicates that Amoebozoa diverged from a lineage that ultimately gave rise to fungi and animals.Gymnamoebas and...
1.8K
Diversity of Protists II
1.8K
Alveolates are a group of organisms recognized by the presence of alveoli, which are cytoplasmic sacs located beneath the cell membrane. While their function remains uncertain, alveoli may help regulate water balance by controlling how much water enters and leaves the cell. In dinoflagellates, these structures may serve as armor plates. There are three major types of alveolates: ciliates, which move using cilia; dinoflagellates, which use flagella for movement; and apicomplexans, which are...
1.8K
Diversity of Protists III
1.7K
Rhizaria are a diverse group of unicellular protists characterized by their threadlike cytoplasmic extensions known as pseudopodia. These structures aid in both locomotion and feeding, giving Rhizaria an amoeboid appearance. Their amoeboid morphology once led to taxonomic confusion, but molecular phylogenetics has clarified their evolutionary placement and emphasized their shared use of pseudopodia despite divergent lineages.This clade comprises diverse lineages such as Chlorarachniophyta,...
1.7K
Diversity of Protists I
1.9K
Excavata is a diverse group of protists that includes both chemoorganotrophic and phototrophic species, with some thriving in anaerobic environments. Among the key groups within Excavata are diplomonads and parabasalids, which are flagellated protists that lack mitochondria and chloroplasts. These microorganisms typically inhabit anoxic environments, such as the intestines of animals, where they exist either symbiotically or as parasites, relying on fermentation for energy production. Some...
1.9K
Overview of Protists
2.7K
Protists are diverse eukaryotic microorganisms that lack the specialized tissues of plants and animals and the chitinous cell walls of fungi. Their early divergence within Eukarya resulted in structural, functional, and ecological diversity. They are classified into supergroups such as Archaeplastida, Excavata, Amoebozoa, Rhizaria, Alveolata, and Stramenopiles, determined through genetic analysis and structural similarities.Structural and Functional AdaptationsProtists have various adaptations...
2.7K
What is an Ecosystem?
47.9K
Overview
47.9K


