Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Therapeutic Communication01:30

Therapeutic Communication

10.0K
Communication is a lifelong learning process. Through therapeutic communication, nurses can collect relevant assessment data, provide education and counseling, and interact during nursing interventions. Sending and receiving messages occur through verbal and nonverbal communication techniques and can happen separately or simultaneously.
Verbal communication depends on language or a prescribed way of using words so that people can share information effectively. The critical aspects of verbal...
10.0K
Non-Verbal Cues01:29

Non-Verbal Cues

412
Non-verbal communication extends beyond gestures and facial expressions to include vocal elements known as paralanguage. Paralanguage consists of non-verbal vocal cues such as pitch, loudness, speech rate, pauses, and non-verbal vocalizations like laughter, sighs, and moans. These elements not only accompany speech but also provide critical emotional and contextual information.The Role of Paralanguage in CommunicationParalanguage adds depth to spoken language by conveying emotions and...
412
Channels of Non-Verbal Communication01:28

Channels of Non-Verbal Communication

602
Non-verbal communication plays a critical role in human interaction, influencing how individuals perceive emotions and psychological states. It operates through four primary channels: facial expressions, eye contact, body language, and touch. These non-verbal cues help convey meaning beyond spoken language and are often culturally influenced.Facial Expressions and Emotional RecognitionFacial expressions are among the most powerful and universal forms of non-verbal communication. Research has...
602
Common Leveling Mistakes and Errors01:17

Common Leveling Mistakes and Errors

557
A survey team is tasked with determining the elevation difference between points Point A and Point B, separated by uneven terrain. They use a leveling instrument and a leveling rod.Common MistakesMisreading the Rod: During a backsight reading at Point A, the instrumentman observes the rod partially obscured by tall grass. Instead of reading 1.135 m, they mistakenly record 1.735 m due to the misalignment of the crosshair with the wrong graduation. This error adds 0.600 m to all subsequent...
557
Impression Management Techniques III: Aligning Actions01:29

Impression Management Techniques III: Aligning Actions

184
Aligning actions are communicative strategies individuals employ to maintain social harmony and preserve personal identity in the face of potential disruptions to social norms. These actions are particularly important in managing social impressions when one's behavior might be seen as inappropriate, incompetent, or morally questionable.Types of Aligning ActionsThe three principal types of aligning actions are disclaimers, accounts, and apologies.DisclaimersDisclaimers are preventive; they are...
184
Understanding Deception01:14

Understanding Deception

215
Deception is a pervasive aspect of human communication. Empirical studies have shown that most individuals engage in some form of deceit on a daily basis, with approximately 20% of social exchanges involving deceptive elements. Lying follows a developmental trajectory, peaking during adolescence and declining with age, possibly due to the maturation of cognitive control and social accountability.Cognitive and Social Factors in Deception DetectionDespite its prevalence, accurately detecting...
215

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Short-term action-effect bindings encode perceptual transitions rather than perceptual end-states.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same author

Agents' awareness of visuo-motor incongruency determines changes in haptic sensitivity.

Experimental brain research·2026
Same author

Response activation in error processing: Assessing leakage into upcoming action episodes.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same author

Playing With Matches: Preparatory Cognitive Processing Shapes Affective Evaluation.

Journal of cognition·2026
Same author

Action Selection by Temporally Close Transitions? Subtle Evidence from the Removal of Tactile Stimulation.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
Same author

Correction: The representational nature of action-effect relations: A memory process dissociation approach.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 12, 2026

Author Spotlight: Deciphering the Cognitive and Neural Mechanisms of Gesture in Communication
07:18

Author Spotlight: Deciphering the Cognitive and Neural Mechanisms of Gesture in Communication

Published on: January 26, 2024

1.4K

How to point and to interpret pointing gestures? Instructions can reduce pointer-observer misunderstandings.

Oliver Herbort1, Wilfried Kunde2

  • 1Department of Psychology, Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg, Röntgenring 11, 97070, Würzburg, Germany. oliver.herbort@psychologie.uni-wuerzburg.de.

Psychological Research
|November 11, 2016
PubMed
Summary

Pointing gestures are often misunderstood due to differing spatial rules between pointers and observers. Reducing this geometric discrepancy significantly improves communication accuracy in pointing acts.

More Related Videos

Capturing Dynamic Finger Gesturing with High-resolution Surface Electromyography and Computer Vision
08:15

Capturing Dynamic Finger Gesturing with High-resolution Surface Electromyography and Computer Vision

Published on: March 28, 2025

1.4K
Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects
07:36

Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects

Published on: November 30, 2018

16.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 12, 2026

Author Spotlight: Deciphering the Cognitive and Neural Mechanisms of Gesture in Communication
07:18

Author Spotlight: Deciphering the Cognitive and Neural Mechanisms of Gesture in Communication

Published on: January 26, 2024

1.4K
Capturing Dynamic Finger Gesturing with High-resolution Surface Electromyography and Computer Vision
08:15

Capturing Dynamic Finger Gesturing with High-resolution Surface Electromyography and Computer Vision

Published on: March 28, 2025

1.4K
Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects
07:36

Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects

Published on: November 30, 2018

16.5K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Science
  • Human Communication
  • Gesture Studies

Background:

  • Pointing is a fundamental communicative act.
  • Misinterpretations in pointing gestures are common.
  • Existing theories suggest geometric discrepancies cause these errors.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To test the hypothesis that differing spatial rules in production and interpretation cause pointing misunderstandings.
  • To investigate the role of visual feedback in pointing accuracy.
  • To identify methods for improving communication through pointing.

Main Methods:

  • Experiment 1: Compared naïve pointing dyads with dyads where geometric discrepancy was reduced.
  • Experiment 2: Assessed pointing accuracy with and without visual feedback.
  • Manipulated the geometry of pointing gestures to analyze production and interpretation vectors.

Main Results:

  • Reducing the geometric discrepancy between pointing production and interpretation vectors decreased misunderstandings.
  • Fewer misunderstandings occurred when pointers lacked visual feedback.
  • Results support the spatial rule discrepancy hypothesis.

Conclusions:

  • Misunderstandings in pointing arise from different spatial rules used by pointers and observers.
  • Instructions minimizing the discrepancy between these spatial rules can enhance pointing communication.
  • Visual feedback may contribute to pointing inaccuracies.