Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 12, 2026

Interventional Diagnostic Procedure: A Practical Guide for the Assessment of Coronary Vascular Function
Published on: March 15, 2022
Gender Differences in Associations Between Intraprocedural Thrombotic Events During Percutaneous Coronary
Mikkel M Schoos1, Roxana Mehran2, George D Dangas2
1The Zena and Michael A. Wiener Cardiovascular Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York; Department of Cardiology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Insights
Intraprocedural Thrombotic Events (IPTEs) occur similarly in men and women undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. While IPTEs increase major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in both genders, they do not explain why women have worse long-term outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Vascular Medicine
Background:
- Women experience higher morbidity after acute coronary syndromes and myocardial infarction.
- The role of thrombotic tendency in gender-based disparities in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) outcomes remains unclear.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the incidence and impact of Intraprocedural Thrombotic Events (IPTEs) on clinical outcomes in women versus men undergoing urgent PCI.
- To determine if increased thrombotic propensity in women contributes to worse outcomes.
Main Methods:
- Pooled analysis of 6,591 patients from the ACUITY and HORIZONS-AMI trials with stent implantation.
- Blinded quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) for IPTE assessment.
- Comparison of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) and major bleeding at in-hospital, 30-day, and 1-year follow-up, stratified by gender and IPTE presence.
Main Results:
- IPTEs occurred in 7.7% of patients (6.8% women, 8.0% men), with no significant gender difference.
- IPTEs, not gender, were independently associated with MACE at in-hospital and 30-day follow-up.
- At 1-year, both female gender and IPTEs were associated with higher MACE risk, but the risk from IPTEs was similar in both genders. IPTEs predicted major bleeding only in women.
Conclusions:
- IPTEs are common in PCI, occur with similar frequency in women and men, and are associated with increased MACE in both genders.
- Increased thrombotic propensity does not explain the worse long-term outcomes observed in women after acute coronary syndromes.
- Women with acute coronary syndromes face a higher risk of adverse outcomes at 1 year, independent of IPTEs.
Abstract:
Women are frequently reported to have increased morbidity after presentation with acute coronary syndromes and myocardial infarction; however, whether a greater thrombotic tendency contributes to gender differences in clinical outcomes of urgent percutaneous coronary intervention is unknown. Intraprocedural Thrombotic Events (IPTEs) are defined as new or increasing thrombus, abrupt vessel closure, no reflow or slow reflow, or distal embolization at any time during percutaneous coronary intervention. IPTEs were evaluated in this pooled analysis of 6,591 patients with stent implantation and blinded quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) analysis, from the ACUITY and HORIZONS-AMI trials. We compared major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at in-hospital, 30-day, and 1-year follow-up and major bleeding at 30 days according to gender and the presence or absence of IPTE. IPTE was identified in 507 patients (7.7%), with 119 of 1,744 (6.8%) occurring in women and 388 of 4,847 (8.0%) in men (p = 0.12). IPTE, but not gender, was independently associated with MACE at in-hospital and 30-day follow-up. At 1-year follow-up, the adjusted hazard of MACE was higher in women and in patients with IPTE; however, the risk of MACE associated with IPTE was similar among women and men. There was no significant interaction between IPTE and gender for 1-year MACE or 30-day bleeding. IPTE predicted major bleeding only in women. In conclusion, in acute coronary syndromes, women have increased risk of adverse outcome at 1 year. IPTEs are common, occur at similar frequency, and are associated with similar degree of increased MACE in both genders at short- and long-term follow-up. Higher thrombotic propensity does not offer a mechanistic explanation for the worse outcomes noted in women.
More Related Videos
05:41Left Anterior Descending Coronary Artery Ligation for Ischemia-Reperfusion Research: Model Improvement via Technical Modifications and Quality Control
Published on: December 16, 2022
06:04Upper-extremity Approach for Secondary Access in Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation
Published on: August 8, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Cardiac Catheterization I: Pre-Procedure Overview
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Cardiac Catheterization II: Right Heart Catheterization
Acute Coronary Syndrome II: Pathophysiology and Clinical Manifestations