Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 12, 2026

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care
Published on: February 16, 2011
Quality agencies at the global level: characteristics and functions-a narrative review
Pedro J Saturno Hernández1, María Fernández Elorriaga1, Ofelia Poblano Verástegui1
1Research Center for Evaluations and Surveys (CIEE), National Institute of Public Health of Mexico (INSP), Cuernavaca, Morelos, México.
Purpose:
To provide a comparative description of the structure, function and activities of quality agencies around the world and describe the published evidence of their impact on the health system.
Data Sources:
A narrative review was conducted using the information found on websites, articles, books and gray literature in English and Spanish.
Study Selection:
The search process included three complementary approaches: (i) websites of agencies, ministries of health and quality-related official institutions; (ii) evaluations, reports, audits or documents regarding quality agencies; and (iii) scientific articles and gray literature found (key word: quality agency) using Ebsco databases. Information was completed using the 'snowball' technique, tracking internet materials and citing literature of reviewed documents.
Data Extraction:
The analytical framework to summarize the information included the agencies' mission, structures, target institutions, activities (following a six-domain model), funding, information management and impact evaluations.
Results Of Data Synthesis:
Information was found regarding quality agencies in 62 countries. Those focusing mainly on accreditation were discarded for further analysis. Agencies with a broader focus, according to the six-domain model for quality improvement (QI) strategies, were found in nine countries. Information resulted very heterogeneous in form and substance. However, they share the function of strengthening and advising on 'public goods', through information, knowledge management and development of standards. No impact evaluations of any type were found.
Conclusion:
The characteristics of existing quality agencies are very heterogeneous, being accreditation the main common focus. There is a lack of both a comprehensive approach to QI strategies and a formal assessment of their impact or contribution for improving quality.
More Related Videos
10:39Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
Published on: August 29, 2025
07:08Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis of Gold Nanoparticles in Aqueous Media through an Inter-Laboratory Comparison
Published on: October 20, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Global Regulatory Systems
Drug Control Governance: Regulatory Bodies and Their Impact
International Nursing Organizations II
The WHO provides expert team support, including funding, vaccines, testing, and treatment tools at the country level to fight...
International Nursing Organizations I
ICN member organizations work to advance the field of nursing and healthcare via policies, partnerships, lobbying, professional...
National Nursing Organizations II
The AACN emphasizes a healthy work environment through six standards to achieve an optimal patient outcome. The standards are appropriate staffing, meaningful recognition, collaboration, authentic leadership, effective communication, and decision-making. In addition, AACN provides certification programs, webinars, journals, and...
Healthcare Agencies I