Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Normal Strain under Axial Loading01:20

Normal Strain under Axial Loading

1.4K
Normal strain under axial loading is an important concept in the field of mechanics of materials. Axial loading implies the application of a force along the axis of a material, like a column or bar. This force can either compress or stretch the material. In the context of axial loading, normal strain is the deformation experienced by the material in the direction of the loading force. It's calculated as the change in length divided by the original length of the material. This unitless ratio...
1.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Multifunctional poly(2-methoxyethyl acrylate) coatings with intermediate water on titanium implants enhance osseointegration via accelerated bone maturation.

Biomaterials advances·2026
Same author

Effect of three-segment scanning on the accuracy of intraoral scans in full-arch implant-supported rehabilitation: an in vitro study.

International journal of implant dentistry·2026
Same author

A VITA Index for predicting cytocompatibility of metallic biomaterials based on ion release and toxicity.

Biomaterials·2026
Same author

Multicenter Sleep Bruxism Clinical Registry in Japan: Development of the registry and exploratory analysis of data-driven clinical subgroups.

Journal of prosthodontic research·2026
Same author

Robust adhesion between solid-state hydroxyapatite and bone tissue through surface demineralization.

Bioactive materials·2025
Same author

Composite Design of In-House Manufactured Patient-Specific Instruments for Precision Mandibular Reconstruction Using Fibula Free Flap.

Cureus·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 12, 2026

An Improved Mechanical Testing Method to Assess Bone-implant Anchorage
11:51

An Improved Mechanical Testing Method to Assess Bone-implant Anchorage

Published on: February 10, 2014

16.0K

Optimally oriented grooves on dental implants improve bone quality around implants under repetitive mechanical

Shinichiro Kuroshima1, Takayoshi Nakano2, Takuya Ishimoto2

  • 1Department of Applied Prosthodontics, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan.

Acta Biomaterialia
|November 14, 2016
PubMed
Summary

Optimal dental implant groove design significantly enhances bone quality and density under mechanical load. The +60° groove design promotes better bone-to-implant contact and osteocyte density, suggesting improved bone integration for dental implants.

Keywords:
Bone qualityImplant designMechanical loadingOrientation of biological apatite c-axis/collagen fibersOsteocytes

More Related Videos

Effects of Mechanical Methods Used in Peri-implantitis Treatment on Implant Surface Decontamination and Roughness
06:36

Effects of Mechanical Methods Used in Peri-implantitis Treatment on Implant Surface Decontamination and Roughness

Published on: March 14, 2025

974
Oral Biofilm Formation on Different Materials for Dental Implants
11:19

Oral Biofilm Formation on Different Materials for Dental Implants

Published on: June 24, 2018

12.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 12, 2026

An Improved Mechanical Testing Method to Assess Bone-implant Anchorage
11:51

An Improved Mechanical Testing Method to Assess Bone-implant Anchorage

Published on: February 10, 2014

16.0K
Effects of Mechanical Methods Used in Peri-implantitis Treatment on Implant Surface Decontamination and Roughness
06:36

Effects of Mechanical Methods Used in Peri-implantitis Treatment on Implant Surface Decontamination and Roughness

Published on: March 14, 2025

974
Oral Biofilm Formation on Different Materials for Dental Implants
11:19

Oral Biofilm Formation on Different Materials for Dental Implants

Published on: June 24, 2018

12.3K

Area of Science:

  • Biomaterials Engineering
  • Orthopedic Research
  • Dental Implantology

Background:

  • Bone quality assessment traditionally focused on density, but structural and biological factors are increasingly recognized.
  • Optimizing dental implant design is crucial for long-term success and osseointegration.
  • Understanding the interplay between implant surface features and bone response under mechanical load is essential.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the impact of specific groove designs on dental implant necks on bone quality.
  • To evaluate how controlled-repetitive mechanical loading affects bone response to different groove designs.
  • To determine if optimized groove geometry can enhance bone-to-implant integration and bone quality.

Main Methods:

  • Anodized Ti-6Al-4V alloy implants with -60° and +60° grooves were placed in rabbit tibiae.
  • Controlled-repetitive mechanical loading was applied to the implants after a 12-week healing period.
  • Bone quality was assessed by measuring osteocyte density and the alignment of biological apatite (BAp) c-axis/collagen fibers.

Main Results:

  • Repetitive mechanical loading significantly increased bone-to-implant contact, bone mass, and bone mineral density (BMD).
  • The +60° groove design promoted preferential alignment of BAp c-axis/collagen fibers along the groove direction under load.
  • +60° grooves showed significantly higher osteocyte density within and adjacent to the implant site compared to -60° grooves.

Conclusions:

  • Optimally oriented groove structures on dental implant surfaces can enhance bone quality and integration.
  • The +60° groove design appears effective in transmitting mechanical load to surrounding bone tissues.
  • Bone quality, alongside BMD, may serve as a critical clinical parameter for evaluating dental implant success.