Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 12, 2026

A New Method for Inducing a Depression-Like Behavior in Rats
Published on: February 22, 2018
Mental Health and Social Networks After Disaster
Richard A Bryant1, H Colin Gallagher1, Lisa Gibbs1
1From the School of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Sydney; the Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne; the Jack Brockhoff Child Health and Wellbeing Program, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne; the Office of the Deputy Vice-Chancellor (Education), University of Sydney, Sydney; the Southgate Institute for Health, Society, and Equity, Flinders University, Adelaide; the Department of Social Work, University of Melbourne, Melbourne; the Victorian Department of Health and Human Services, Melbourne; the Centre for Disaster Management and Public Safety, University of Melbourne, Melbourne; Emergency Services, Australian Red Cross, Melbourne; Phoenix Australia-Centre for Posttraumatic Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne; and the Centre for Transformative Innovation, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne.
Objective:
Although disasters are a major cause of mental health problems and typically affect large numbers of people and communities, little is known about how social structures affect mental health after a disaster. The authors assessed the extent to which mental health outcomes after disaster are associated with social network structures.
Method:
In a community-based cohort study of survivors of a major bushfire disaster, participants (N=558) were assessed for probable posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and probable depression. Social networks were assessed by asking participants to nominate people with whom they felt personally close. These nominations were used to construct a social network map that showed each participant's ties to other participants they nominated and also to other participants who nominated them. This map was then analyzed for prevailing patterns of mental health outcomes.
Results:
Depression risk was higher for participants who reported fewer social connections, were connected to other depressed people, or were connected to people who had left their community. PTSD risk was higher if fewer people reported being connected with the participant, if those who felt close to the participant had higher levels of property loss, or if the participant was linked to others who were themselves not interconnected. Interestingly, being connected to other people who in turn were reciprocally close to each other was associated with a lower risk of PTSD.
Conclusions:
These findings provide the first evidence of disorder-specific patterns in relation to one's social connections after disaster. Depression appears to co-occur in linked individuals, whereas PTSD risk is increased with social fragmentation. These patterns underscore the need to adopt a sociocentric perspective of postdisaster mental health in order to better understand the potential for societal interventions in the wake of disaster.
More Related Videos
05:03Author Spotlight: Unveiling Mechanisms of Stress Resilience - Significant Findings, Advancements, and Future Research
Published on: December 15, 2023
10:43Developing Neuroimaging Phenotypes of the Default Mode Network in PTSD: Integrating the Resting State, Working Memory, and Structural Connectivity
Published on: July 1, 2014
Related Concept Videos
Stress Prevention and Stress Management Techniques V
Post-traumatic Stress Disorder
Symptoms and Behavioral Manifestations
A spectrum of distressing symptoms characterizes PTSD. Recurrent flashbacks, where individuals involuntarily relive traumatic events,...
Social Relationships and Well-Being
Stress and Mental Health
Individuals with depression often experience challenges in both their personal and professional...
Introduction to Stress and Lifestyle
Self-Help Support Groups
Accessibility and Cost-Effectiveness
One of the primary strengths of self-help...