Related Experiment Videos

Denial and medical outcome in unstable angina

J L Levenson1, A Mishra, R M Hamer

  • 1Department of Psychiatry, Medical College of Virginia, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond.

Psychosomatic Medicine
|January 1, 1989
PubMed

Insights

Denial can be adaptive for patients hospitalized with acute coronary syndrome. High deniers experienced less angina and achieved better medical stabilization compared to low deniers.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Psychological Medicine

Background:

  • Denial as a psychological coping mechanism.
  • Potential adaptive role of denial in acute medical conditions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the impact of denial on patient outcomes during hospitalization for unstable angina.
  • To compare clinical outcomes between high and low deniers.

Main Methods:

  • Study included 48 patients with unstable angina.
  • Patients were assessed using the Hackett-Cassem Denial Scale, categorizing them into high (25) and low (23) deniers.
  • Groups were compared on baseline characteristics, cardiac history, treatment, and hospitalization outcomes.

Main Results:

  • High deniers reported significantly fewer angina episodes (1.3 vs. 2.5) compared to low deniers.
  • A higher percentage of high deniers achieved medical stabilization (92% vs. 65%).
  • High deniers required less frequent intravenous nitroglycerin (32% vs. 78%); all adverse events (2 MIs, 1 death) occurred in low deniers.

Conclusions:

  • Denial independently predicts a better medical outcome during acute hospitalization for unstable angina.
  • The findings suggest denial may serve an adaptive function in this patient population.

Related Concept Videos