Modifying the Clinical Research Infrastructure at a Dedicated Clinical Trials Unit: Assessment of Trial Development, Activation, and Participant Accrual
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 12, 2026

Observational Study Protocol for Repeated Clinical Examination and Critical Care Ultrasonography Within the Simple Intensive Care Studies
Published on: January 16, 2019
Chad Tang1, Kenneth R Hess2, Dwana Sanders3
1Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas. CTang1@mdanderson.org dshong@mdanderson.org.
Abstract:
Purpose: Information on processes for trials assessing investigational therapeutics is sparse. We assessed the trial development processes within the Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics (ICT) at MD Anderson Cancer Center (Houston, TX) and analyzed their effects on the trial activation timeline and enrolment.Experimental Design: Data were from a prospectively maintained registry that tracks all clinical studies at MD Anderson. From this database, we identified 2,261 activated phase I-III trials; 221 were done at the ICT. ICT trials were matched to trials from other MD Anderson departments by phase, sponsorship, and submission year. Trial performance metrics were compared with paired Wilcoxon signed rank tests.Results: We identified three facets of the ICT research infrastructure: parallel processing of trial approval steps; a physician-led research team; and regular weekly meetings to foster research accountability. Separate analyses were conducted stratified by sponsorship [industry (133 ICT and 133 non-ICT trials) or institutional (68 ICT and 68 non-ICT trials)]. ICT trial development was faster from IRB approval to activation (median difference of 1.1 months for industry-sponsored trials vs. 2.3 months for institutional) and from activation to first enrolment (median difference of 0.3 months for industry vs. 1.2 months for institutional; all matched P < 0.05). ICT trials also accrued more patients (median difference of 8 participants for industry vs. 33.5 for institutional) quicker (median difference 4.8 participants/year for industry vs. 11.1 for institutional; all matched P < 0.05).Conclusions: Use of a clinical research-focused infrastructure within a large academic cancer center was associated with efficient trial development and participant accrual. Clin Cancer Res; 23(6); 1407-13. ©2016 AACR.
Insights
Implementing a dedicated clinical research infrastructure accelerates investigational cancer therapeutics trials, improving activation timelines and patient enrollment in academic cancer centers.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Clinical Trial Management
- Translational Research
Background:
- Information on clinical trial development processes, particularly for investigational therapeutics, is limited.
- Optimizing trial timelines and patient accrual is crucial for advancing cancer treatment research.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the trial development processes within the Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics (ICT) at MD Anderson Cancer Center.
- To analyze the impact of the ICT's infrastructure on trial activation timelines and patient enrollment.
Main Methods:
- A prospectively maintained registry of all clinical studies at MD Anderson was utilized.
- 2,261 activated phase I-III trials were identified, with 221 from ICT, matched to non-ICT trials by phase, sponsorship, and submission year.
- Trial performance metrics were compared using paired Wilcoxon signed rank tests.
Main Results:
- The ICT infrastructure features parallel processing, a physician-led team, and regular accountability meetings.
- ICT trials demonstrated faster activation from Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval to activation and from activation to first enrollment compared to non-ICT trials.
- ICT trials showed significantly higher patient accrual rates and faster participant enrollment.
Conclusions:
- A clinical research-focused infrastructure in an academic cancer center is associated with efficient trial development.
- Streamlined processes within the ICT department led to improved trial activation and patient accrual.
- These findings highlight the importance of specialized infrastructure for accelerating therapeutic development in oncology.
Related Concept Videos
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Clinical Trials: Overview
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Preclinical Development: Overview
Nursing Clinical Information System
A Nursing Clinical Information System (NCIS) is a specialized type of healthcare information system tailored to meet the unique needs of nursing practice. It incorporates the principles of nursing informatics to streamline information management and improve the quality of care delivery.
Critical attributes of NCIS include:
Study Designs in Epidemiology
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...

