Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

The Scientific Method in Nursing Process01:18

The Scientific Method in Nursing Process

19.1K
The scientific method provides the foundation for any research. It is the most reliable and objective of all forms of gaining knowledge and guides in applying research-based evidence in practice and conducting future research.
When using research findings to change practice, one must understand the process used to guide a study. The scientific method is a systematic, step-by-step process that supports the data's validity, reliability, and generalizability. As a result, findings can be...
19.1K
Systematic Sampling Method01:17

Systematic Sampling Method

13.7K
Sampling is a technique to select a portion (or subset) of the larger population and study that portion (the sample) to gain information about the population. Data are the result of sampling from a population. The sampling method ensures that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population. Because measuring the entire population in a study is not practical, researchers use samples to represent the population of interest.
Systematic sampling is one of the simplest methods...
13.7K
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

11.3K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
11.3K
The Scientific Method01:32

The Scientific Method

274.1K
The scientific method is a detailed, empirical problem-solving process used by biologists and other scientists. This iterative approach involves formulating a question based on observation, developing a testable potential explanation for the observation (called a hypothesis), making and testing predictions based on the hypothesis, and using the findings to create new hypotheses and predictions.
Generally, predictions are tested using carefully-designed experiments. Based on the outcome of these...
274.1K
The Scientific Method02:40

The Scientific Method

66.8K
Research is what makes the difference between facts and opinions. Facts are observable realities, and opinions are personal judgments, conclusions, or attitudes that may or may not be accurate. In the scientific community, facts can be established only using evidence collected through empirical research.
66.8K
Review and Preview01:13

Review and Preview

12.0K
Data are individual items of information obtained from a population or sample. Data may be classified as qualitative (categorical), quantitative continuous, or quantitative discrete. Because it is not practical to measure the entire population in a study, researchers use samples to represent the population. A random sample is a representative group from the population chosen by using a method that gives each individual in the population an equal chance of being included in the sample. Random...
12.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Unpacking the black box - a questionnaire study of how medical journals identify and manage conflicts of interest of editors and peer reviewers.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2026
Same author

Using and distinguishing evidence from non-randomised studies of interventions.

BMJ evidence-based medicine·2026
Same author

Ethical, legal, and social issues related to ingestible, implantable electronic devices and mRNA delivery devices.

Device·2025
Same author

Enhancing Methods for Research on Cannabis: A Workshop Report.

Journal of cannabis research·2025
Same author

Letter to the Editor: the World Conference on Tobacco Control - Mixed Perspectives and Controversies.

Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco·2025
Same author

Conflict of interest policies for editors and peer reviewers in medical journals: cross-sectional study.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 12, 2026

Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness and Safety of Shugan Jieyu Capsules for the Treatment of Insomnia
04:34

Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness and Safety of Shugan Jieyu Capsules for the Treatment of Insomnia

Published on: February 17, 2023

1.7K

Systematic Review: A Method at Risk for Being Corrupted.

Lisa Bero1

  • 1Lisa Bero is with the Charles Perkins Centre and the Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia, and is also the co-chair of the Cochrane Steering Group, London, England.

American Journal of Public Health
|November 18, 2016
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Systematic reviews face credibility challenges due to methodological issues and lack of policy relevance. Improving standards and addressing special interests can enhance their influence on policymaking.

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

1.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 12, 2026

Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness and Safety of Shugan Jieyu Capsules for the Treatment of Insomnia
04:34

Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness and Safety of Shugan Jieyu Capsules for the Treatment of Insomnia

Published on: February 17, 2023

1.7K
Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

1.3K

Area of Science:

  • Evidence-based practice
  • Health policy research
  • Scientific methodology

Background:

  • The volume of systematic reviews is growing rapidly.
  • Concerns exist regarding the credibility and reliability of systematic reviews.
  • Systematic reviews are crucial for informing health policy decisions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To examine the factors threatening the credibility of systematic reviews.
  • To explore the impact of special interests on systematic review integrity.
  • To propose strategies for enhancing the policy relevance of systematic reviews.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of systematic review production trends.
  • Case study using Cochrane reviews.
  • Examination of methodological standards and special interest influences.

Main Results:

  • Methodological shortcomings and poor policy relevance undermine systematic review credibility.
  • Special interests can potentially bias systematic reviews.
  • There is a need for strengthened standards and increased policy engagement.

Conclusions:

  • Enhancing systematic review credibility requires addressing methodological rigor and policy relevance.
  • Implementing robust standards and mitigating external influences are essential.
  • Systematic reviews can be more effectively utilized in policymaking through targeted improvements.