Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 12, 2026
09:07
Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations
Published on: September 16, 2015
9.5K
Scientific uncertainty in media content: Introduction to this special issue
Hans Peter Peters1, Sharon Dunwoody2
1Forschungszentrum Jülich, Germany h.p.peters@fz-juelich.de.
Public Understanding of Science (Bristol, England)
|November 19, 2016
Summary
This study explores how media content is created and perceived, focusing on scientific uncertainty. It examines the roles of journalists, scientists, and audiences in shaping public understanding of complex issues.
Area of Science:
- Communication Studies
- Science Journalism
- Public Understanding of Science
Background:
- The special issue addresses the multifaceted nature of communicating scientific uncertainty.
- Examines the process of media content creation involving various stakeholders.
Discussion:
- Analyzes how media portrays scientific uncertainty and its impact on public perception.
- Investigates the consequences for individuals' own uncertainty assessments.
Key Insights:
- Highlights the complex interplay between media producers, scientific sources, and audiences.
- Underscores the importance of understanding how uncertainty is framed and received.
Outlook:
- Sets the stage for a deeper exploration of scientific uncertainty communication in subsequent articles.
- Provides a framework for future research on media's role in public science engagement.
Related Concept Videos
01:10Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error
1.5K
The atomic mass of an element varies due to the relative ratio of its isotopes. A sample's relative proportion of oxygen isotopes influences its average atomic mass. For instance, if we were to measure the atomic mass of oxygen from a sample, the mass would be a weighted average of the isotopic masses of oxygen in that sample. Since a single sample is not likely to perfectly reflect the true atomic mass of oxygen for all the molecules of oxygen on Earth, the mass we obtain from this...
1.5K
00:59Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error
2.1K
An experiment often consists of more than a single step. In this case, measurements at each step give rise to uncertainty. Because the measurements occur in successive steps, the uncertainty in one step necessarily contributes to that in the subsequent step. As we perform statistical analysis on these types of experiments, we must learn to account for the propagation of uncertainty from one step to the next. The propagation of uncertainty depends on the type of arithmetic operation performed on...
2.1K
00:59Uncertainty: Overview
1.8K
In analytical chemistry, we often perform repetitive measurements to detect and minimize inaccuracies caused by both determinate and indeterminate errors. Despite the cares we take, the presence of random errors means that repeated measurements almost never have exactly the same magnitude. The collective difference between these measurements - observed values - and the estimated or expected value is called uncertainty. Uncertainty is conventionally written after the estimated or expected value.
1.8K
00:54Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals
11.9K
The confidence interval is the range of values around the mean that contains the true mean. It is expressed as a probability percentage. The interpretation of a 95% confidence interval, for instance, is that the statistician is 95% confident that the true mean falls within the interval. The upper and lower limits of this range are known as confidence limits. The confidence limits for the true mean are estimated from the sample's mean, the standard deviation, and the statistical factor...
11.9K
03:37Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision
112.8K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value.
112.8K
01:15Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors
11.3K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
11.3K