Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 12, 2026

Shrinkage of Dental Composite in Simulated Cavity Measured with Digital Image Correlation
Published on: July 21, 2014
Class II composite resin restorations: faster, easier, predictable
1American Academy of Cosmetic Dentistry, Madison, Wisconsin; Diplomate, American Board of Aesthetic Dentistry, Columbus, Ohio; Private Practice, Middleburg, Virginia, USA.
Abstract:
Composite resin continues to displace amalgam as the preferred direct restorative material in developed countries. Even though composite materials have evolved to include nanoparticles with high physical properties and low shrinkage stress, dentists have been challenged to efficiently create quality, long lasting, predictable restorations. Unlike amalgam, composite resin cannot be condensed making the establishment of a predictable, proper contact more difficult. In addition, composite requires an understanding of adhesives and an appreciation for their exacting application. These facts combined with the precise adaptation and light-curing of multiple layers makes placement of quality Class II composite restorations tedious and time-consuming. For private practicing dentists, it can also have an effect on economic productivity. Clinicians have always wanted an easier, efficient placement technique for posterior composite restorations that rivals that for amalgam. It appears that advances in instrumentation, materials and technology have finally delivered it.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Veneer
Other veneering techniques include plain-slicing, quarter-slicing, and rift-slicing. These...
Composite Masonry Walls

