Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 11, 2026

09:10
Digital Hybrid Model Preparation for Virtual Planning of Reconstructive Dentoalveolar Surgical Procedures
Published on: August 5, 2021
2.4K
Testing a Novel 3D Printed Radiographic Imaging Device for Use in Forensic Odontology
Tara L Newcomb1, Ann M Bruhn1, Bridget Giles2
1School of Dental Hygiene, College of Health Sciences, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA, 23529.
Journal of Forensic Sciences
|November 19, 2016
Summary
New 3D-printed devices improve forensic dental radiology. The modified external aiming device (MEAD) showed the fewest errors, while soft dental wax was fastest but had the most errors.
Area of Science:
- Forensic dentistry
- Radiology
- 3D printing technology
Background:
- Forensic dental radiology faces challenges with X-ray equipment alignment.
- Existing positioning limitations hinder accurate imaging of teeth of interest.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate a novel 3D-printed device, the combined holding and aiming device (CHAD), for forensic dental radiology.
- To compare the CHAD with soft dental wax and a modified external aiming device (MEAD) regarding device preference, radiographer efficiency, and technique errors.
Main Methods:
- Twenty-four participants performed six X-ray exposures using the CHAD, soft dental wax, and MEAD.
- A total of 432 X-rays were scored for technique errors and time efficiency.
- Statistical analysis was performed to determine significant differences between the devices (p=0.0015).
Main Results:
- A significant difference in performance was observed among the three devices (p=0.0015).
- The MEAD demonstrated the lowest total number of errors.
- Soft dental wax was the quickest method but resulted in the highest error rates.
Conclusions:
- Both the MEAD and CHAD performed better overall than soft dental wax in forensic dental radiology.
- Further research into holding devices is recommended to enhance forensic dental radiology techniques.

