Tailored perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis in urological surgery: myth or reality?
Magnus J Grabe1, Karl-Johan Lundström
1aDepartment of Translational Medicine, Division of Urological Cancer, University of Lund, Lund bDepartment of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Urology and Andrology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Purpose Of Review:
The controversies surrounding perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis (AMP) are about the use and especially misuse of antibiotics. The overall lack of evidence to facilitate a rational perioperative AMP policy in urological surgery and the postoperative infectious complications remain a challenge. Therefore, a basic tool to aid decision-making would be useful. A model based on the patients' risk factors, the level of contamination and grading of surgical procedures is discussed.
Recent Findings:
A series of studies have shown that infectious complications and healthcare-associated infections remain consistently at an average of 10%, with a great variation in frequency dependent on the patients' preoperative status and the type, severity and contamination level of the surgical procedure. Preoperative patient assessment and preparation are key factors for well tolerated surgery and recovery. Adherence to the guidelines appears to reduce both the prescription of antimicrobials and the total costs without risking the patient outcome. Several studies of a series of interventions such as cystoscopy, endoscopic stone surgery and selected clean-contaminated interventions give support to the model. Bacteriuria, upgrading the patient to the contaminated level, requires preoperative control.
Summary:
The discussed model assists the urologists in decision-making on perioperative AMP and contributes to a responsible use of antibiotics.
Insights
This study introduces a model to guide perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis (AMP) decisions in urological surgery, aiming to reduce antibiotic misuse and improve patient outcomes by considering risk factors and procedure contamination levels.
Area of Science:
- Urology
- Infectious Diseases
- Surgical Prophylaxis
Background:
- Controversies exist regarding the use and misuse of perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis (AMP) in urological surgery.
- A lack of evidence hinders the development of rational AMP policies, leading to challenges in managing postoperative infectious complications.
- Healthcare-associated infections occur in approximately 10% of surgical cases, influenced by patient status and procedure characteristics.
Purpose of the Study:
- To address the need for a decision-making tool for perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis in urological surgery.
- To promote rational and responsible antibiotic use in the perioperative setting.
- To develop a model that aids urologists in selecting appropriate antimicrobial prophylaxis.
Main Methods:
- A model is proposed that integrates patient risk factors, surgical procedure contamination levels, and surgical grading.
- The model's utility is supported by studies on interventions like cystoscopy, endoscopic stone surgery, and clean-contaminated procedures.
- Preoperative assessment and patient preparation are highlighted as crucial for surgical outcomes.
Main Results:
- The proposed model assists urologists in making informed decisions regarding perioperative AMP.
- Adherence to guidelines, informed by the model, can reduce antimicrobial prescriptions and healthcare costs without compromising patient outcomes.
- Preoperative control of bacteriuria is essential for patients classified at a higher contamination level.
Conclusions:
- The discussed model facilitates responsible antibiotic use in perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis for urological procedures.
- Implementing this model can help standardize AMP policies and reduce the incidence of infectious complications.
- Further adoption of evidence-based decision-making tools is crucial for optimizing antimicrobial stewardship in surgery.
Related Concept Videos
Urinary Tract Infection III: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Kidney Transplant II: Surgical Procedure
Urine Studies II: Urine Culture and Sensitivity Test
Urinary Tract Calculi VI: Surgical Management
Urinary Tract Infection IV: Nursing Management
Acute Pyelonephritis II: Diagnostic Studies and Management


