Effect of cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with diabetes randomized in EchoCRT
Matthias P Nägele1, Jan Steffel1, Michele Robertson2
1Department of Cardiology, University Heart Centre Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Insights
Heart failure patients with diabetes receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) showed a trend towards less harm, particularly fewer hospitalizations for heart failure, compared to those without diabetes in the EchoCRT study.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Medical Devices
- Diabetes Management
Background:
- Patients with heart failure (HF) and diabetes have a poorer prognosis.
- Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is a treatment for HF, but its effectiveness can vary.
- Understanding how diabetes influences CRT outcomes is crucial for personalized treatment.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the outcomes of heart failure patients with and without diabetes who were randomized in the Echocardiography Guided Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (EchoCRT) study.
- To investigate the interaction between diabetes and CRT efficacy in heart failure patients.
Main Methods:
- A post-hoc subgroup analysis of the EchoCRT study.
- Patients with QRS duration <130 ms and left ventricular dyssynchrony were randomized to CRT ON vs. CRT OFF.
- Outcomes, including the primary endpoint (all-cause death or HF hospitalization), were compared between diabetic and non-diabetic subgroups.
Main Results:
- The primary outcome occurred more frequently in patients with diabetes (32.6%) than without (23%, P=0.003).
- A significant interaction was observed: CRT ON vs. CRT OFF showed a higher risk in patients without diabetes (HR 1.58) but not in those with diabetes (HR 0.86; P interaction=0.041).
- This effect was primarily driven by HF hospitalizations, with a pronounced benefit of CRT in diabetic patients with non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy (HR 0.27 vs. 1.79; P interaction=0.005).
Conclusions:
- In the EchoCRT study, heart failure patients with diabetes and narrow QRS complexes showed a signal for less harm from CRT compared to non-diabetic patients.
- This apparent benefit was mainly driven by differences in heart failure hospitalizations.
- The findings suggest a potential differential effect of CRT based on diabetes status, particularly in specific subgroups like non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy.
Aims:
As patients with heart failure (HF) and concomitant diabetes carry a poor prognosis, this post-hoc subgroup analysis aimed to compare the outcomes of patients with and without diabetes randomized in the Echocardiography Guided Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (EchoCRT) study.
Methods And Results:
EchoCRT randomized patients with a QRS duration <130 ms and echocardiographic evidence of left ventricular dyssynchrony to CRT turned on (CRT=ON) vs. off (CRT=OFF) following device implantation. At study entry, 328 patients (40.5%) had diabetes. The primary outcome (all-cause death or first hospitalization for worsening HF) occurred more frequently in patients with than without diabetes (32.6% vs. 23%, P = 0.003). A significant treatment interaction was observed for the primary outcome indicating a higher risk for CRT=ON vs. CRT-OFF in patients without [26.5% vs. 19.8%, hazard ratio (HR) 1.58, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.08-2.31] vs. with diabetes (31.4% vs. 34%; HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.58-1.27; P for interaction 0.041). This effect was mainly driven by a lower rate in HF hospitalizations, but was only of borderline significance after multivariate adjustment (P = 0.063). The most pronounced effect was observed in patients with non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy, where a significantly reduced risk of reaching the primary endpoint for CRT=ON vs. CRT-OFF was observed in patients with (HR 0.27, P = 0.003) vs. patients without diabetes (HR 1.79, P = 0.038; P for interaction 0.005). No treatment interaction by diabetes diagnosis was found for mortality endpoints.
Conclusion:
In EchoCRT, HF patients with a narrow QRS complex and coexisting diabetes demonstrated a signal for less harm caused by CRT compared with patients without diabetes, which was driven by differences in hospitalizations owing to HF.
More Related Videos
10:17Real-Time Cardiac Mapping with a Noninvasive Imageless Electrocardiographic Imaging System
Published on: April 11, 2025
11:00Assessment of Sarcoplasmic Reticulum Calcium Reserve and Intracellular Diastolic Calcium Removal in Isolated Ventricular Cardiomyocytes
Published on: September 18, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
Cardiomyopathy IV: Restrictive Cardiomyopathy
Heart Failure Drugs: Inhibitors of Renin-Angiotensin System
