Patient-derived glioblastoma stem cells respond differentially to targeted therapies
Pratik Kanabur1,2, Sujuan Guo1, Gary R Simonds3
1Virginia Tech Carilion Research Institute, Roanoke, VA 24016, United States.
Abstract:
The dismal prognosis of glioblastoma is, at least in part, attributable to the difficulty in eradicating glioblastoma stem cells (GSCs). However, whether this difficulty is caused by the differential responses of GSCs to drugs remains to be determined. To address this, we isolated and characterized ten GSC lines from established cell lines, xenografts, or patient specimens. Six lines formed spheres in a regular culture condition, whereas the remaining four lines grew as monolayer. These adherent lines formed spheres only in plates coated with poly-2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate. The self-renewal capabilities of GSCs varied, with the cell density needed for sphere formation ranging from 4 to 23.8 cells/well. Moreover, a single non-adherent GSC either remained quiescent or divided into two cells in four-seven days. The stem cell identity of GSCs was further verified by the expression of nestin or glial fibrillary acidic protein. Of the two GSC lines that were injected in immunodeficient mice, only one line formed a tumor in two months. The protein levels of NOTCH1 and platelet derived growth factor receptor alpha positively correlated with the responsiveness of GSCs to γ-secretase inhibitor IX or imatinib, two compounds that inhibit these two proteins, respectively. Furthermore, a combination of temozolomide and a connexin 43 inhibitor robustly inhibited the growth of GSCs. Collectively, our results demonstrate that patient-derived GSCs exhibit different growth rates in culture, possess differential capabilities to form a tumor, and have varied responses to targeted therapies. Our findings underscore the importance of patient-derived GSCs in glioblastoma research and therapeutic development.
Insights
Glioblastoma stem cells (GSCs) show varied growth, tumor formation, and drug responses. Understanding these patient-derived GSC differences is crucial for developing effective glioblastoma treatments.
Area of Science:
- Neuro-oncology
- Cancer stem cell biology
- Molecular oncology
Background:
- Glioblastoma (GBM) has a poor prognosis, partly due to the challenge of eradicating glioblastoma stem cells (GSCs).
- The differential drug responses of GSCs may contribute to treatment resistance, but this remains under investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the heterogeneity of patient-derived GSCs.
- To assess the variability in GSC self-renewal, tumor formation, and response to targeted therapies.
Main Methods:
- Isolation and characterization of ten GSC lines from various sources.
- Assessment of self-renewal capacity and in vivo tumor formation in immunodeficient mice.
- Analysis of GSC response to specific inhibitors (γ-secretase inhibitor IX, imatinib, temozolomide, connexin 43 inhibitor) and correlation with protein expression (NOTCH1, PDGFRA).
Main Results:
- GSC lines exhibited diverse growth patterns (spheres vs. monolayer) and self-renewal capabilities.
- Only one of two tested GSC lines formed tumors in vivo.
- NOTCH1 and PDGFRA protein levels correlated with GSC sensitivity to specific inhibitors.
- Combined treatment with temozolomide and a connexin 43 inhibitor significantly inhibited GSC growth.
Conclusions:
- Patient-derived GSCs display significant heterogeneity in growth, tumorigenicity, and drug responsiveness.
- These findings highlight the importance of utilizing patient-derived GSCs for advancing glioblastoma research and therapeutic strategies.
More Related Videos
12:25Optimization of High Grade Glioma Cell Culture from Surgical Specimens for Use in Clinically Relevant Animal Models and 3D Immunochemistry
Published on: January 7, 2014
09:36Live-Cell Imaging Assays to Study Glioblastoma Brain Tumor Stem Cell Migration and Invasion
Published on: August 29, 2018
