Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision03:37

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

112.8K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value. 
112.8K
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

15.7K
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
15.7K
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

884
884
Ordinal Level of Measurement00:55

Ordinal Level of Measurement

36.1K
The way a set of data is measured is called its level of measurement. Correct statistical procedures depend on a researcher being familiar with levels of measurement. For analysis, data are classified into four levels of measurement—nominal, ordinal, interval, and ratio.
Data measured using an ordinal scale are similar to nominal scale data, but there is one major difference. The ordinal scale data can be ordered. An example of ordinal scale data is a list of the top five national parks...
36.1K
Interval Level of Measurement00:55

Interval Level of Measurement

19.8K
For effective statistical analysis, data are classified into four levels of measurement—nominal, ordinal, interval, and ratio.
Data measured using the interval scale are similar to ordinal level data because they have a definite arrangement. However, in the interval level of measurement, the differences between data values are meaningful even though the data does not have a starting point.
Temperature is measured using the interval scale. It is measurable data, and the difference between...
19.8K
Statistical Analysis: Overview01:11

Statistical Analysis: Overview

16.8K
When we take repeated measurements on the same or replicated samples, we will observe inconsistencies in the magnitude. These inconsistencies are called errors. To categorize and characterize these results and their errors, the researcher can use statistical analysis to determine the quality of the measurements and/or suitability of the methods.
One of the most commonly used statistical quantifiers is the mean, which is the ratio between the sum of the numerical values of all results and the...
16.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Risk of dementia after bloodstream infection-a nationwide propensity score matched cohort study.

Age and ageing·2026
Same author

European Society of Contact Dermatitis Guideline for Diagnostic Patch Testing-Recommendations on Best Practice (Update 2026).

Contact dermatitis·2026
Same author

SPIRIT 2025 statement: updated guideline for protocols of randomised trials.

Lancet (London, England)·2026
Same author

Sample Size Calculation for the ROCI Design.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same author

Bayesian analysis in confirmatory clinical trials: A narrative review and discussion of current practice.

Clinical trials (London, England)·2026
Same author

Adjusting for confounding in population administrative data when confounders are only measured in a linked cohort.

International journal of population data science·2026
Same journal

Inference on data with both multiplicative and additive measurement errors.

Scandinavian journal of statistics, theory and applications·2026
Same journal

Xuran Meng and Yi Li's contribution to the Discussion of "On optimal linear prediction" by I. Helland.

Scandinavian journal of statistics, theory and applications·2026
Same journal

Post-selection inference for high-dimensional mediation analysis with survival outcomes.

Scandinavian journal of statistics, theory and applications·2025
Same journal

Post-selection inference for the Cox model with interval-censored data.

Scandinavian journal of statistics, theory and applications·2025
Same journal

Enriched Pitman-Yor processes.

Scandinavian journal of statistics, theory and applications·2025
Same journal

A New Paradigm for High-dimensional Data: Distance-Based Semiparametric Feature Aggregation Framework via Between-Subject Attributes.

Scandinavian journal of statistics, theory and applications·2024
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 11, 2026

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

3.8K

Linear Increments with Non-monotone Missing Data and Measurement Error.

Shaun R Seaman1, Daniel Farewell2, Ian R White1

  • 1Medical Research Council Biostatistics Unit.

Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Theory and Applications
|November 22, 2016
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Linear increments (LI) methods for analyzing repeated outcome data with missing values have limitations. This study shows LI can handle non-monotone missingness or measurement error, but not both simultaneously.

Keywords:
ignorabilityimputationmissing not at randommortal cohort inferencenon‐ignorable missing datapartly conditional inference

More Related Videos

Precision of In Vivo Quantitative Tooth Wear Measurement Using Intra-Oral Scans
09:10

Precision of In Vivo Quantitative Tooth Wear Measurement Using Intra-Oral Scans

Published on: July 12, 2022

3.6K
A Method of Trigonometric Modelling of Seasonal Variation Demonstrated with Multiple Sclerosis Relapse Data
10:46

A Method of Trigonometric Modelling of Seasonal Variation Demonstrated with Multiple Sclerosis Relapse Data

Published on: December 9, 2015

11.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 11, 2026

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

3.8K
Precision of In Vivo Quantitative Tooth Wear Measurement Using Intra-Oral Scans
09:10

Precision of In Vivo Quantitative Tooth Wear Measurement Using Intra-Oral Scans

Published on: July 12, 2022

3.6K
A Method of Trigonometric Modelling of Seasonal Variation Demonstrated with Multiple Sclerosis Relapse Data
10:46

A Method of Trigonometric Modelling of Seasonal Variation Demonstrated with Multiple Sclerosis Relapse Data

Published on: December 9, 2015

11.2K

Area of Science:

  • Statistics
  • Biostatistics
  • Longitudinal Data Analysis

Background:

  • Repeated outcome data often contain missing values, necessitating robust analytical methods.
  • Existing linear increments (LI) methods have limitations regarding missingness patterns and measurement error assumptions.
  • Understanding the trade-offs between different LI approaches is crucial for accurate data analysis.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To clarify the capabilities and limitations of linear increments (LI) methods for analyzing longitudinal data with missing values.
  • To compare LI methods with multivariate normal models, particularly concerning missingness patterns and measurement error.
  • To identify optimal analytical strategies for handling non-monotone missing data and measurement error in repeated outcome analyses.

Main Methods:

  • Investigated the assumptions and performance of two previously proposed linear increments (LI) methods.
  • Developed theoretical insights into the constraints of LI regarding non-monotone missingness and independent measurement error.
  • Compared LI methods with multivariate normal models under various missing data assumptions, including missing at random (MAR).

Main Results:

  • Demonstrated that linear increments (LI) methods can accommodate either non-monotone missingness or independent measurement error, but not both concurrently.
  • Clarified the relationship between missing at random (MAR) assumptions and LI method requirements.
  • Showed that multivariate normal models offer consistent estimation under less restrictive assumptions than LI for continuous outcomes, especially with non-monotone missingness, and are often more efficient.

Conclusions:

  • Linear increments (LI) methods have inherent trade-offs between handling missing data patterns and measurement error.
  • Multivariate normal models provide a more flexible and often more efficient alternative to LI for analyzing repeated outcome data, particularly when missingness is non-monotone.
  • Researchers should carefully consider the assumptions and limitations of LI methods versus multivariate normal models for optimal analysis of longitudinal data.