Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Genetic Screens02:46

Genetic Screens

5.8K
Genetic screens are tools used to identify genes and mutations responsible for phenotypes of interest. Genetic screens help identify individuals or a group of people at risk of developing  genetic diseases and help them with early intervention, targeted therapy, and reproductive options.
Forward genetic screens
Forward or “classical” genetic screens involve creating random mutations in an organism’s DNA using radiation, mutagens, or insertion of additional bases, which...
5.8K
Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons02:54

Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons

7.1K
Genome comparison is one of the excellent ways to interpret the evolutionary relationships between organisms. The basic principle of genome comparison is that if two species share a common feature, it is likely encoded by the DNA sequence conserved between both species. The advent of genome sequencing technologies in the late 20th century enabled scientists to understand the concept of conservation of domains between species and helped them to deduce evolutionary relationships across diverse...
7.1K
Genetics of Speciation02:16

Genetics of Speciation

22.9K
Speciation is the evolutionary process resulting in the formation of new, distinct species—groups of reproductively isolated populations.
22.9K
Frequency-dependent Selection01:21

Frequency-dependent Selection

24.4K
When the fitness of a trait is influenced by how common it is (i.e., its frequency) relative to different traits within a population, this is referred to as frequency-dependent selection. Frequency-dependent selection may occur between species or within a single species. This type of selection can either be positive—with more common phenotypes having higher fitness—or negative, with rarer phenotypes conferring increased fitness.
24.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Computational and modeling approaches for US threshold genetic evaluations of calving ease.

JDS communications·2026
Same author

Approximating reliabilities of indirect predictions using single nucleotide polymorphism effects from large single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor evaluations.

Journal of dairy science·2025
Same author

Scalar methods to deregress and split genomic predictions, and associated behavior of simple regressions, for later use in combined prediction and validations.

Journal of dairy science·2025
Same author

Efficient implementation of multitrait random regression test-day models with external information for dairy cattle genomic evaluations.

Journal of dairy science·2025
Same author

Study of Genetic Progress in the Context of Disconnection Between Two Originally Connected Populations.

Journal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie·2025
Same author

Review: Genomic selection in the era of phenotyping based on digital images.

Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 11, 2026

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
07:35

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

Published on: October 11, 2018

8.1K

Invited review: efficient computation strategies in genomic selection.

I Misztal1, A Legarra2

  • 11Department of Animal and Dairy Science,University of Georgia,Athens,GA 30602,USA.

Animal : an International Journal of Animal Bioscience
|November 22, 2016
PubMed
Summary

This review evaluates computational methods for genomic selection in animal breeding. Efficient algorithms like sparse Cholesky decomposition and iterative solvers enable large-scale genomic prediction and genome-wide association studies.

Keywords:
REMLgenomic relationship matrixgenomic selectioninversesingle-step

More Related Videos

A Deep-sequencing-assisted, Spontaneous Suppressor Screen in the Fission Yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe
07:55

A Deep-sequencing-assisted, Spontaneous Suppressor Screen in the Fission Yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe

Published on: March 7, 2019

8.6K
A Quantitative Fitness Analysis Workflow
11:39

A Quantitative Fitness Analysis Workflow

Published on: August 13, 2012

15.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 11, 2026

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
07:35

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

Published on: October 11, 2018

8.1K
A Deep-sequencing-assisted, Spontaneous Suppressor Screen in the Fission Yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe
07:55

A Deep-sequencing-assisted, Spontaneous Suppressor Screen in the Fission Yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe

Published on: March 7, 2019

8.6K
A Quantitative Fitness Analysis Workflow
11:39

A Quantitative Fitness Analysis Workflow

Published on: August 13, 2012

15.0K

Area of Science:

  • Animal Genetics
  • Computational Biology
  • Quantitative Genetics

Background:

  • Genomic selection (GS) is crucial for accelerating genetic gain in animal breeding.
  • Accurate genomic prediction requires efficient computational methods for large datasets.
  • Existing methods face challenges with scalability and computational cost.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review and evaluate computational methods for genomic selection in animal breeding.
  • To identify efficient algorithms for genomic prediction, parameter estimation, and genome-wide association studies (GWAS).
  • To assess the impact of computational advancements on the feasibility of GS in large populations.

Main Methods:

  • Evaluation of commonly used models: SNP BLUP, GBLUP, and ssGBLUP.
  • Analysis of solving methods: Cholesky decomposition, Gauss-Seidel (GS), and preconditioned conjugate gradient (PCG), including iteration on data.
  • Assessment of specialized matrix inversion techniques (e.g., APY) and sparse solvers (e.g., YAMS).

Main Results:

  • Iterative methods (GS, PCG) with iteration on data are efficient for SNP BLUP and general solutions, respectively.
  • The APY inverse enables GBLUP and ssGBLUP for large populations.
  • The YAMS package significantly improves performance for sparse systems with dense blocks, allowing GREML on large populations.

Conclusions:

  • Genomic selection is computationally maturing, with advanced methods enhancing scalability.
  • Efficient algorithms and specialized solvers are key to applying GS in large-scale animal breeding programs.
  • The reviewed methods facilitate accurate genomic prediction and GWAS, driving genetic progress.