Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

[On the unpredictability of suicide].

Massimo Biondi1, Angela Iannitelli2, Stefano Ferracuti1

  • 1Dipartimento di Neurologia e Psichiatria, Sapienza Università di Roma.

Rivista Di Psichiatria
|November 22, 2016
PubMed
Summary

Psychiatrists face professional liability due to suicide, yet identifying suicide risk lacks sufficient scientific data. This complexity challenges legal certainty and patient freedom in mental healthcare.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Genetic discrimination in workplace, insurance industry and legal system: A review.

Legal medicine (Tokyo, Japan)·2026
Same author

Forensic-psychiatric and medico-legal challenges in euthanasia and assisted suicide for patients with mental disorders: balancing autonomy, vulnerability, and professional responsibility.

Frontiers in psychiatry·2026
Same author

Hypersexuality across neurological disorders: A systematic review of aetiologies, clinical manifestations, assessment methods, and management strategies.

Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews·2026
Same author

The final appointment: risk factors and prevention of femicide.

Rivista di psichiatria·2026
Same authorSame journal

Homicide-suicide: current evidence, risk assessment, and medico-legal implications in forensic psychiatry.

Rivista di psichiatria·2026
Same authorSame journal

The absolute possess. A psychoanalytic reading of femicide.

Rivista di psichiatria·2026

Area of Science:

  • Psychiatry
  • Forensic Psychiatry
  • Mental Health Law

Background:

  • Suicide is a leading cause of professional liability for psychiatrists.
  • Current beliefs link suicide to mental illness and deem it preventable, influencing legal judgments.
  • There's a significant gap in research identifying clinically useful variables for suicide risk assessment, even in high-risk individuals.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To highlight the discrepancy between societal expectations and scientific evidence regarding suicide risk assessment in psychiatry.
  • To underscore the need for data-driven approaches in determining professional responsibility related to patient suicide.
  • To advocate for a more nuanced understanding of suicide's complexity within legal and clinical frameworks.

Main Methods:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Literature review on suicide, psychiatric liability, and risk assessment.
  • Analysis of the scientific basis for current legal and social perceptions of suicide.
  • Examination of the challenges in establishing causality in suicide cases for legal proceedings.

    • Main Results:

    • Scientific data for identifying clinically useful suicide risk variables is insufficient.
    • Judgments of professional responsibility often stem from social needs rather than empirical evidence.
    • Suicide is a complex phenomenon that defies simple causal attribution required by criminal law.

    Conclusions:

    • Current practices in psychiatric liability related to suicide are not adequately supported by scientific data.
    • The complexity of suicide necessitates a re-evaluation of how professional responsibility is assessed.
    • Balancing patient autonomy with suicide prevention requires evidence-based strategies, not punitive measures based on social demand.