Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Concept Videos

The Scientific Method03:50

The Scientific Method

70.6K
Chemistry is an empirical science. Scientists often pose questions to understand the chemistry in everyday life and seek answers to these questions. To achieve this, scientists follow a definitive series of steps that together make up the Scientific Method. This approach involves making observations, asking questions, building a hypothesis, conducting experiments, analyzing results, and forming a conclusion. 
70.6K
The Scientific Method01:32

The Scientific Method

274.1K
The scientific method is a detailed, empirical problem-solving process used by biologists and other scientists. This iterative approach involves formulating a question based on observation, developing a testable potential explanation for the observation (called a hypothesis), making and testing predictions based on the hypothesis, and using the findings to create new hypotheses and predictions.
Generally, predictions are tested using carefully-designed experiments. Based on the outcome of these...
274.1K
The Scientific Method02:40

The Scientific Method

66.8K
Research is what makes the difference between facts and opinions. Facts are observable realities, and opinions are personal judgments, conclusions, or attitudes that may or may not be accurate. In the scientific community, facts can be established only using evidence collected through empirical research.
66.8K
Scientific Laws and Theories02:31

Scientific Laws and Theories

90.9K
Scientific Laws
90.9K
Preclinical Development: Overview01:28

Preclinical Development: Overview

6.3K
Preclinical development consists of a series of tests that ensure the safety and efficacy of a new therapeutic compound before it is tested in humans. There are four main phases to this process. First, safety pharmacology tests are conducted to ensure the drug does not produce any acutely harmful effects. These tests examine parameters such as bronchoconstriction, cardiac dysrhythmias, blood pressure changes, and ataxia. Next, preliminary toxicological testing is performed to determine the...
6.3K
Significance Testing: Overview01:04

Significance Testing: Overview

12.9K
Significance testing is a set of statistical methods used to test whether a claim about a parameter is valid. In analytical chemistry, significance testing is used primarily to determine whether the difference between two values comes from determinate or random errors. The effect of a particular change in the measurement protocol, analyst, or sample itself can cause a deviation from the expected result. In the case of a suspected deviation/outlier, we need to be able to confirm mathematically...
12.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Understanding caregivers' experiences and perspectives on online support: a qualitative study.

Aging & mental health·2026
Same author

Agency and insecurities in (re)making a sense of home amidst later life homelessness: towards a conceptual framing.

The Gerontologist·2026
Same author

The role of general practitioners in dementia diagnosis: a scoping review of clinical practice guidelines.

Family practice·2026
Same author

CRISPRi screening in cultured human astrocytes uncovers distal enhancers controlling genes dysregulated in Alzheimer's disease.

Nature neuroscience·2025
Same author

Self-directed learning and clinical decision support.

The Ulster medical journal·2025
Same author

Digital clinical decision support to improve care and to save costs: a pilot survey of the views of frontline healthcare professionals.

Proceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center)·2025
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 11, 2026

Micro-scale Engineering for Cell Biology
04:42

Micro-scale Engineering for Cell Biology

Published on: October 1, 2007

5.3K

Discussing discursive discussions.

Kieran Walsh1

  • 1BMJ Learning, London, UK.

Medical Education
|November 23, 2016
PubMed
Summary

Writing effective discussion sections in medical education research is crucial. This paper reviews common errors and provides guidance for strengthening these vital components of scientific papers.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Education Research
  • Scientific Writing

Background:

  • Discussion sections are vital in medical education research papers.
  • Limited guidance exists on effectively writing these sections.
  • A well-structured discussion links results, evaluates study limitations, and assesses applicability.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review discussion sections in Medical Education journal articles.
  • To identify common errors in writing discussion sections.
  • To provide insights for improving the quality of discussion sections.

Main Methods:

  • A review of discussion sections from research papers published in Medical Education.
  • Analysis of common strengths and weaknesses in the reviewed sections.

More Related Videos

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
05:47

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems

Published on: June 13, 2025

1.8K
Meta-analysis of Voxel-Based Neuroimaging Studies using Seed-based d Mapping with Permutation of Subject Images SDM-PSI
06:26

Meta-analysis of Voxel-Based Neuroimaging Studies using Seed-based d Mapping with Permutation of Subject Images SDM-PSI

Published on: November 27, 2019

78.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 11, 2026

Micro-scale Engineering for Cell Biology
04:42

Micro-scale Engineering for Cell Biology

Published on: October 1, 2007

5.3K
Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
05:47

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems

Published on: June 13, 2025

1.8K
Meta-analysis of Voxel-Based Neuroimaging Studies using Seed-based d Mapping with Permutation of Subject Images SDM-PSI
06:26

Meta-analysis of Voxel-Based Neuroimaging Studies using Seed-based d Mapping with Permutation of Subject Images SDM-PSI

Published on: November 27, 2019

78.5K

Main Results:

  • Identified common errors include minimizing weaknesses, exaggerating strengths, premature closure of debate, and unrealistic technological optimism.
  • Discussions can be excessively long, impacting readability.
  • Effective discussions require a balanced perspective and realistic evaluation.

Conclusions:

  • Clear guidance is needed for writing robust discussion sections in medical education research.
  • Avoiding common pitfalls can enhance the impact and clarity of research findings.
  • Future research should focus on best practices for discussion section composition.