Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 11, 2026

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons
Published on: November 9, 2018
Global gain modulation generates time-dependent urgency during perceptual choice in humans
Peter R Murphy1,2, Evert Boonstra1, Sander Nieuwenhuis1
1Institute of Psychology and Leiden Institute for Brain and Cognition, Leiden University, 2333 AK Leiden, The Netherlands.
Humans dynamically adjust decision-making speed and accuracy under time pressure. This involves lowering evidence thresholds and increasing urgency, potentially via neural gain modulation, demonstrating context-sensitive time-dependency in human choices.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Decision Science
- Computational Neuroscience
Background:
- Optimal decision-making involves balancing information gathering with deliberation costs.
- Dynamic adjustment of the speed/accuracy trade-off is crucial for reward maximization.
- Human capacity for time-dependent decision adjustments remains unclear.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify signatures of time-dependency in human perceptual decision-making.
- To explore the neural underpinnings of these time-dependent adjustments.
- To investigate the role of neural gain modulation in decision urgency.
Main Methods:
- Behavioral analyses of perceptual decision-making under deadline pressure.
- Model-based analyses to quantify decision strategies.
- Electrophysiological and pupillometry measures to assess neural activity and gain modulation.
Main Results:
- Subjects lowered their evidence criterion as deadlines approached, indicating increased speed pressure.
- Evidence-independent urgency signals were observed, pushing motor preparation closer to a threshold.
- Task-related pupil diameter fluctuations correlated with neural gain modulation, suggesting a mechanism for urgency.
Conclusions:
- Human perceptual decision-making exhibits context-sensitive time-dependency.
- Urgency signals, modulated by neural gain, are a key component of these dynamic adjustments.
- Findings highlight the flexibility of human decision processes in response to temporal constraints.
More Related Videos
08:24The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
Published on: August 25, 2023
13:00Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
Published on: January 23, 2017
Related Concept Videos
The Availability Heuristic
Factors Affecting Perception
An illustrative example of a perceptual set is the scenario where an airline pilot told...
The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic
Timing and Consequences on Behavior
Humans, however, can respond to delayed reinforcers. We often make decisions between immediate small rewards and delayed larger rewards. This ability to delay gratification is a significant...
Reason and Intuition