Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

9.2K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
9.2K
Group Design02:01

Group Design

11.0K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
11.0K
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs01:15

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs

359
Bioequivalence experimental study designs play a pivotal role in testing the effectiveness of various treatments. Key among these are the repeated measures, cross-over, carry-over, and Latin square designs. In the repeated measures design, each subject receives all treatments, allowing for temporal comparisons. This type of design is useful in reducing variability but requires careful planning to avoid bias.The cross-over design, an economical method, involves sequential administration of...
359
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs01:20

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs

348
Bioequivalence experimental study designs are crucial methodologies used in evaluating and comparing the bioavailability of different drug products. These designs are categorized into various types: completely randomized, randomized block, repeated measures, cross and carry-over, and Latin square designs.Completely randomized designs involve randomly allocating treatments to all subjects participating in the experiment. This allocation is achieved by assigning unique random numbers to subjects...
348
Study Design in Statistics01:15

Study Design in Statistics

10.2K
A study design is a set of techniques that allow a researcher to collect and analyze data from different variables defined for a specific research problem. Statistics is commonly for effective study design and more robust experiments,
Does aspirin reduce the risk of heart attacks? Is one brand of fertilizer more effective at growing roses than another? Is fatigue as dangerous to a driver as the influence of alcohol? Questions like these are answered using randomized experiments with proper...
10.2K
Cluster Sampling Method01:20

Cluster Sampling Method

15.3K
Appropriate sampling methods ensure that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population. Because measuring the entire population in a study is not practical, researchers use samples to represent the population of interest.
To choose a cluster sample, divide the population into clusters (groups) and then randomly select some of the clusters. All the members from these clusters are in the cluster sample. For example, if you randomly sample four departments from your...
15.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Comparing risk factors in severe COVID-19 using machine learning and non-machine learning methods: analysis from 2 international randomized controlled trials.

JAMIA open·2026
Same author

PROTOCOL: Comparative Effectiveness of Tools for Communicating Health Research Results to Study Participants and Others With Relevant Lived Experience: A Living Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Campbell systematic reviews·2026
Same author

Reporting of Cohort and Routinely Collected Data in Randomised Controlled Trial Protocols (SPIRIT-ROUTINE): extension checklist with explanation and elaboration.

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)·2026
Same author

Language-related eligibility criteria in UK randomised trials: a systematic review of extended research reports.

Trials·2026
Same author

On-treatment serum prostate-specific antigen and overall survival in prostate cancer (STAMPEDE platform protocol): a post-hoc analysis of data from five phase 3 trials.

The Lancet. Oncology·2026
Same author

How to design a ROCI (Response Over Continuous Intervention) randomised trial: guidance and a case study.

BMC medical research methodology·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 11, 2026

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
04:53

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition

Published on: September 20, 2019

11.4K

How do you design randomised trials for smaller populations? A framework.

Mahesh K B Parmar1, Matthew R Sydes1, Tim P Morris2,3

  • 1London Hub for Trials Methodology Research, MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Aviation House, 125 Kingsway, London, WC2B 6NH, UK.

BMC Medicine
|November 26, 2016
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Designing randomized phase III trials can be challenging when ideal sample sizes are unachievable. This framework offers practical steps to adapt trial designs, ensuring robust evidence generation even with limited recruitment for new treatments.

Keywords:
Randomised trialsSmaller populationsTrial designUncommon diseases

More Related Videos

A Within-Subject Experimental Design using an Object Location Task in Rats
09:28

A Within-Subject Experimental Design using an Object Location Task in Rats

Published on: May 6, 2021

5.3K
Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

15.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 11, 2026

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
04:53

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition

Published on: September 20, 2019

11.4K
A Within-Subject Experimental Design using an Object Location Task in Rats
09:28

A Within-Subject Experimental Design using an Object Location Task in Rats

Published on: May 6, 2021

5.3K
Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

15.4K

Area of Science:

  • Clinical Trial Design
  • Biostatistics
  • Medical Research Methodology

Background:

  • Randomized phase III trials are crucial for evaluating new treatments but often require large sample sizes.
  • Recruitment challenges can prevent achieving ideal sample sizes within practical timeframes.
  • Existing frequentist approaches need adaptation for feasibility in resource-limited settings.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present an ordered framework for designing feasible randomized trials when ideal sample sizes cannot be met.
  • To provide practical strategies for adapting trial parameters to increase achievable participant numbers and reduce sample size targets.
  • To ensure high-quality evidence generation for treatment evaluation despite recruitment constraints.

Main Methods:

  • Proposes a three-step framework for trial design adaptation.
  • Step 1: Maximize recruitment potential (extend collaborations, broaden eligibility, increase time).
  • Step 2: Optimize design parameters (research arm, outcomes, power, effect size).
  • Step 3: Implement advanced statistical strategies (one-sided tests, adjusted alpha, covariates, re-randomization, external data) if feasibility remains an issue.
  • Illustrates application with a worked example from the Euramos-1 trial.

Main Results:

  • The framework offers a systematic approach to modify trial designs for feasibility.
  • Specific alterations can increase achievable participant numbers and potentially reduce required sample sizes.
  • The proposed methods, when applied judiciously, can still yield a good evidence base for treatment evaluation.

Conclusions:

  • This framework enables the appropriate evaluation of treatments when large-scale phase III trials are not feasible.
  • It addresses the pressing need for high-quality randomized data, even for less common diseases or challenging recruitment scenarios.
  • The approach balances feasibility with the generation of robust evidence for clinical decision-making.