Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 11, 2026

Vessel-sparing Excision and Primary Anastomosis
Published on: January 7, 2019
The Swedish infant high-grade reflux trial: Study presentation and vesicoureteral reflux outcome
Josefin Nordenström1, Gundela Holmdahl1, Per Brandström2
1Department of Paediatric Surgery, Paediatric Uronephrologic Centre, Queen Silvia Children's Hospital, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Sweden.
Insights
Endoscopic treatment (ET) offers a higher resolution rate for high-grade vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) in infants compared to antibiotic prophylaxis. This minimally invasive option shows promise, though bilateral grade 5 VUR has a poor prognosis.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Urology
- Minimally Invasive Surgery
- Renal Health
Background:
- High-grade vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) in infants is linked to renal abnormalities and recurrent UTIs.
- Endoscopic treatment (ET) is established for lower VUR grades, but evidence for high-grade VUR in infants is limited.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate endoscopic injection as a treatment for high-grade VUR in infants.
- To compare the efficacy of ET versus continuous antibiotic prophylaxis for infant VUR.
Main Methods:
- A prospective, randomized, controlled trial involving 77 infants (<8 months) with VUR grades 4-5.
- Infants were randomized to antibiotic prophylaxis (n=39) or ET (n=38).
- Follow-up included VCUG, ultrasound, and renal scintigraphy at 1 year.
Main Results:
- Endoscopic treatment (ET) resulted in VUR grade ≤2 in 59% of infants, versus 21% with prophylaxis (p=0.0014).
- Success rates for ET were 100% for unilateral grade 4 VUR, decreasing to 31% for bilateral grade 5.
- Predictors for VUR downgrading included ET, unilateral VUR, grade 4, and low residual urine.
Conclusions:
- Endoscopic injection is a viable, minimally invasive alternative for high-grade VUR in infants.
- ET demonstrates a higher resolution rate than antibiotic prophylaxis for infant VUR.
- Bilateral grade 5 VUR presents a poor prognosis; recurrence rates after ET are consistent with prior studies.
Introduction:
High-grade vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) in infants is associated with congenital renal abnormalities, recurrent UTI, and bladder dysfunction. Endoscopic treatment (ET) is a well-established method in children with low to moderate reflux grades, but there is a lack of randomised controlled trials regarding the use of ET versus continuous antibiotic prophylaxis in infants with high-grade VUR.
Objective:
This study aimed to determine whether high-grade VUR in infants can be treated with endoscopic injection and whether ET is superior to antibiotic prophylaxis in the treatment of VUR.
Materials And Methods:
This prospective, randomised, controlled, multicentre, 1-year follow-up trial comprised 77 infants (55 boys, 22 girls) <8 months of age with VUR grade 4-5 (n = 30/n = 47). Of the infants, 52 (68%) had bilateral VUR. Thirty-nine were randomised to antibiotic prophylaxis and 38 to ET (with prophylaxis until resolution). Voiding cystourethrogram, ultrasound, renal scintigraphy, and free voiding observation were performed at study entry and after 1 year to evaluate VUR grade, and renal and bladder function.
Results:
VUR grade ≤2 was seen in 22 (59%) infants in the endoscopy group and eight (21%) in the prophylaxis group at follow-up (p = 0.0014). The success rate in the endoscopy group was 100% in unilateral grade 4, falling to 31% in bilateral grade 5 (p = 0.0094). Correspondingly, the results in the prophylaxis group were 40% in grade 4 down to 0% in bilateral grade 5 (p = 0.037) (Table). Logistic regression analyses identified ET, VUR grade 4, unilaterality, and low residual urine at baseline as positive predictors of VUR down-grading to ≤2 (area under ROC curve 0.88). In four patients with reflux resolution after one injection, dilating reflux recurred at the 1-year follow-up. One patient had a UTI possibly related to ET. In our material four patients required re-implantation, of whom one was obstructive after injection.
Discussion:
The opportunity to offer even small infants with high-grade VUR an alternative, minimally invasive treatment option is a great advance in paediatric urology. In this high-risk group, bilateral VUR grade 5 stands out with its poor bladder function and low chance of resolution. The recurrence rate of dilating VUR after successful ET is consistent with previous studies. The limitations are the relatively small number of patients and the short follow-up.
Conclusion:
High-grade VUR in infants can be treated with injection therapy and the resolution rate is higher than that of prophylaxis treatment. The complication rate is low and VUR grade 4, unilaterality, and low residual urine are favourable for the resolution and down-grading of VUR.
Related Concept Videos
Urodynamic Studies: Uroflowmetry
Imaging Studies VI: Voiding Cystourethrography and Cystography
Imaging Studies V: Intravenous Urography and Retrograde Pyelography
Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease II: Clinical Features and Management
Clinical Manifestations
GERD presents itself in a multitude of ways, with symptoms varying from person to person. The hallmark symptoms are...
Urinary Tract Infection III: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Imaging Studies I: Kidney, Ureter, and Bladder Studies

