Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 11, 2026

Microarray-based Identification of Individual HERV Loci Expression: Application to Biomarker Discovery in Prostate Cancer
Published on: November 2, 2013
Cell-cycle Progression-score Might Improve the Current Risk Assessment in Newly Diagnosed Prostate Cancer Patients
Marco Oderda1, Gabriele Cozzi2, Lorenzo Daniele3
1Department of Surgical Sciences, Urology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Objective:
To assess whether cell-cycle progression (CCP)-score (Prolaris) can improve the current risk assessment in newly diagnosed prostate cancer (PCa) patients. CCP-score is a well-validated prognostic assay predictive of PCa death, biochemical recurrence, and progression.
Methods:
We evaluated CCP-score at biopsy in 52 patients newly diagnosed with PCa who underwent radical prostatectomy. CCP-score was calculated as average RNA expression of 31 CCP genes, normalized to 15 housekeeping genes. The predictive ability of CCP-score was assessed in univariate and multivariate analyses, and compared to that of Ki-67 levels and traditional clinical variables including prostate-specific antigen, Gleason score, stage, and percentage of positive cores at biopsy.
Results:
In spite of an overall good accuracy in attributing the correct risk class, 7 high-risk and 13 intermediate-risk patients were misclassified by the Prolaris test. On analysis of variance, mean CCP-score significantly differed across different risk classes based on pathologic results (-1.2 in low risk, -0.444 in intermediate risk, 0.208 in high risk). CCP-score was a significant predictor of high-risk PCa both on univariate and multivariate analyses, after adjusting for clinical variables. Combining CCP-score and the European Association of Urology clinical risk assessment improved the accuracy of risk attribution by around 10%, up to 87.8%. CCP-score was a significant predictor of biochemical recurrence, but only on univariate analysis.
Conclusion:
The CCP-score might provide important new information to risk assessment of newly diagnosed PCa in addition to traditional clinical variables. A correct risk attribution is essential to tailor the best treatment for each patient.

