Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 11, 2026

Quantification of Levator Ani Hiatus Enlargement by Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Males and Females with Pelvic Organ Prolapse
Published on: April 17, 2019
Quiet MR sequences in clinical routine: initial experience in abdominal imaging
Sebastian Fischer1, David M Grodzki2, Markus Domschke3
1Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Theodor Stern Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt, Germany. sebastian.fischer@kgu.de.
Objective:
Purpose of our study was to demonstrate the feasibility and limitations of acoustic noise reduction in a standard clinical MRI protocol for abdominal imaging.
Methods:
Acoustic noise and image quality were assessed in 17 patients for a standard liver imaging protocol including TSE and GRE sequences and compared to quiet optimizations as described by Heismann et al. Two blinded readers scored artifacts, the delineation of the abdominal organs and level of diagnostic confidence. Means of the sound level measurements, the ratings and the measurement of SNR and CNR were compared.
Results:
Significant reduction of acoustic noise was measured for T2 TSE (-30.7%), T2 HASTE (-22.6%) and less difference for T1 DIXON (-4.7%) and T1 FLASH (-2.7%). SNR and CNR were lower for quiet T2 TSE (-18.0%, -23.1%) and T2 HASTE (-46.2%, -37.7%) and higher for T1 DIXON (+32.0%, +24.4%). Inter-rater correlation was k = 0.987 with p < 0.001.
Conclusions:
Although sequence-based noise optimizations faces problems in T1 FLASH and DIXON sequences, there is an important acoustic benefit in T2 TSE and T2 HASTE sequences, which goes along with a maintained image quality and diagnostic confidence.
Insights
Acoustic noise reduction in MRI is feasible for T2 TSE and T2 HASTE sequences, maintaining diagnostic image quality. However, limitations exist for T1 FLASH and DIXON sequences.
Area of Science:
- Medical Imaging
- Acoustics
- Radiology
Background:
- Acoustic noise in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) can impact patient comfort and image quality.
- Optimizing MRI protocols to reduce noise is crucial for clinical applications.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the feasibility and limitations of acoustic noise reduction in a standard clinical MRI protocol for abdominal imaging.
- To evaluate the impact of noise reduction on image quality and diagnostic confidence.
Main Methods:
- Acoustic noise and image quality were evaluated in 17 patients using a standard liver MRI protocol.
- T2 TSE (T2-weighted Turbo Spin Echo) and GRE (Gradient-Recalled Echo) sequences were compared with quiet optimizations.
- Two blinded readers assessed artifacts, organ delineation, and diagnostic confidence. Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR) and Contrast-to-Noise Ratio (CNR) were measured.
Main Results:
- Significant acoustic noise reduction was observed in T2 TSE (-30.7%) and T2 HASTE (-22.6%) sequences.
- SNR and CNR decreased for quiet T2 TSE and T2 HASTE sequences but increased for T1 DIXON and T1 FLASH sequences.
- Inter-rater reliability for image quality assessment was high (k=0.987).
Conclusions:
- Sequence-based acoustic noise optimization offers significant benefits for T2 TSE and T2 HASTE abdominal MRI.
- Image quality and diagnostic confidence were maintained in T2 TSE and T2 HASTE sequences despite noise reduction.
- Challenges remain for noise reduction in T1 FLASH and DIXON sequences.
More Related Videos
05:50Author Spotlight: Point-of-Care Ultrasound for Gastric Content Assessment and Risk Stratification in Perioperative Care
Published on: September 22, 2023
07:12Author Spotlight: Using Point-of-Care Ultrasound for Comprehensive Evaluation of the Abdominal Aorta
Published on: September 8, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies I: CT and MRI
Description of the Procedures
Computed Tomography (CT) scan:
Computed Tomography (CT) scans use X-ray technology to generate detailed images of bones, organs, and tissues. During the scan, the patient lies on a moving table...
Imaging Studies IV: Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Imaging Studies II: Ultrasonography
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Imaging Studies III: Computed Tomography
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System IV: CMRI