Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Flow Cytometry01:23

Flow Cytometry

16.9K
The development of flow cytometry techniques began in 1934 with initial attempts by Andrew Moldavan, a bacteriologist who counted the cells in a flowing capillary system. Moldavan pumped cells through a capillary tube focused under a microscope for visualization. The invention of photometry allowed the measurement of differentially-stained cells, and Louis Kamentsky developed the first multiparameter flow cytometer in 1965 to identify and count the cancer cells in cervical tissue specimens.
In...
16.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Coordinated immune-epithelial dynamics in the nasal epithelium protect against respiratory virus infection.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Single-cell spatial pharmacobiology identifies conserved stromal barriers to therapeutic antibody delivery in human solid tumors.

Nature biotechnology·2026
Same author

CD39<sup>+</sup>CD49a<sup>+</sup>CD103<sup>+</sup> cytotoxic tissue-resident natural killer cells infiltrate and control solid epithelial tumor growth in mice.

Science translational medicine·2026
Same author

Estimating time since influenza virus exposure using single-cell proteomic data.

Frontiers in immunology·2026
Same author

Epstein-Barr virus orchestrates spatial reorganization and immunomodulation in the classic Hodgkin lymphoma tumor microenvironment.

Cell reports. Medicine·2026
Same author

Reprogramming of stroma-derived chemokine networks drives the loss of tissue organization in nodal B cell lymphoma.

Nature cancer·2026
Same journal

Trust, Reproducibility, and Progress: The Roles of Independent Blind Prediction and Assessment and Benchmarking in Computational Biology.

Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing·2026
Same journal

The Evolving Cyberinfrastructure at the National Institutes of Health to Support Data and AI in Biomedical Research.

Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing·2026
Same journal

Applications of AI & ML in Biomanufacturing of Cell and Gene Therapies.

Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing·2026
Same journal

AI for Health: Leveraging Artificial Intelligence to Revolutionize Healthcare.

Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing·2026
Same journal

Workshop Introduction: Advances of AI Methods in Single Cell Spatial Omics.

Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing·2026
Same journal

DRIVE-KG: Enhancing variant-phenotype association discovery in understudied complex diseases using heterogeneous knowledge graphs.

Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 11, 2026

Sample Preparation for Mass Cytometry Analysis
06:28

Sample Preparation for Mass Cytometry Analysis

Published on: April 29, 2017

16.7K

AN UPDATED DEBARCODING TOOL FOR MASS CYTOMETRY WITH CELL TYPE-SPECIFIC AND CELL SAMPLE-SPECIFIC STRINGENCY

Kristen I Fread1, William D Strickland, Garry P Nolan

  • 1Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22903, USA, kif5qw@virginia.edu.

Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing
|November 30, 2016
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study enhances pooled sample analysis in mass cytometry by updating a debarcoding algorithm. The new method allows for cell-specific parameter adjustments, reducing bias and improving data quality in high-throughput experiments.

More Related Videos

Isolation and Staining of Mouse Skin Keratinocytes for Cell Cycle Specific Analysis of Cellular Protein Expression by Mass Cytometry
12:34

Isolation and Staining of Mouse Skin Keratinocytes for Cell Cycle Specific Analysis of Cellular Protein Expression by Mass Cytometry

Published on: May 9, 2019

8.2K
Single-cell Analysis of Immunophenotype and Cytokine Production in Peripheral Whole Blood via Mass Cytometry
12:36

Single-cell Analysis of Immunophenotype and Cytokine Production in Peripheral Whole Blood via Mass Cytometry

Published on: June 26, 2018

10.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 11, 2026

Sample Preparation for Mass Cytometry Analysis
06:28

Sample Preparation for Mass Cytometry Analysis

Published on: April 29, 2017

16.7K
Isolation and Staining of Mouse Skin Keratinocytes for Cell Cycle Specific Analysis of Cellular Protein Expression by Mass Cytometry
12:34

Isolation and Staining of Mouse Skin Keratinocytes for Cell Cycle Specific Analysis of Cellular Protein Expression by Mass Cytometry

Published on: May 9, 2019

8.2K
Single-cell Analysis of Immunophenotype and Cytokine Production in Peripheral Whole Blood via Mass Cytometry
12:36

Single-cell Analysis of Immunophenotype and Cytokine Production in Peripheral Whole Blood via Mass Cytometry

Published on: June 26, 2018

10.0K

Area of Science:

  • Biotechnology
  • Immunology
  • Computational Biology

Background:

  • Pooled sample analysis via mass cytometry barcoding offers significant advantages, including reduced reagent use and increased throughput.
  • Previous debarcoding algorithms had limitations in handling non-uniform barcode staining intensity, potentially introducing bias.
  • Variability in barcode staining across pooled samples can affect cell yield and data accuracy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To improve the accuracy and reduce bias in single-cell debarcoding for mass cytometry.
  • To develop a flexible debarcoding strategy that accounts for cell-specific and sample-specific variations.
  • To provide enhanced data exploration tools for quality control in barcoded mass cytometry datasets.

Main Methods:

  • An updated single-cell debarcoding algorithm was developed to output per-cell debarcoding parameters.
  • The new algorithm decouples stringency filtering from the sample assignment process.
  • Post-assignment filtering is performed using 1- and 2-dimensional gating on debarcoding parameters.

Main Results:

  • The updated algorithm allows for visualization and analysis of debarcoding parameters in FCS files.
  • This strategy enables the detection of cell type- and sample-specific effects during debarcoding.
  • Adjustable stringency filtering effectively removes bias in cell yield introduced by the debarcoding process.

Conclusions:

  • The enhanced debarcoding strategy improves the quality and reliability of pooled mass cytometry data.
  • This approach offers greater flexibility and accuracy in sample deconvolution, particularly with variable barcode staining.
  • The developed data exploration tools serve as a crucial quality check for barcoded mass cytometry experiments.