Continuous decoding of human grasp kinematics using epidural and subdural signals
Robert D Flint1, Joshua M Rosenow1,2,3, Matthew C Tate1,2
1Department of Neurology, Northwestern University, Chicago IL 60611, USA.
Journal of Neural Engineering
|December 1, 2016
Summary
Brain-machine interfaces can restore hand function. This study shows that less invasive epidural recordings can decode hand movements as accurately as subdural recordings, paving the way for clinical applications.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Biomedical Engineering
- Rehabilitation Technology
Background:
- Restoring function in paralyzed individuals is a key goal for brain-machine interfaces (BMIs).
- Regaining hand function is a major objective for patients with paralysis.
- Accurate movement control and minimized invasiveness are crucial for widespread adoption of hand neuroprostheses.
Purpose of the Study:
- To explore the trade-offs between decoding accuracy and invasiveness in hand movement control.
- To compare the efficacy of subdural (electrocorticography; ECoG) and epidural field potentials (EFPs) for decoding continuous hand kinematics.
- To assess the impact of electrode array resolution on decoding performance.
Main Methods:
- Measured continuous hand and finger kinematics during naturalistic grasping motions in five human subjects.
- Recorded both subdural ECoG and epidural field potentials (EFPs) using standard- and high-resolution electrode arrays.
- Analyzed decoding accuracy of kinematics from recorded neural signals.
Main Results:
- Decoding of continuous kinematics significantly exceeded chance for both ECoG and EFPs.
- ECoG decoding accuracy was comparable to previous studies (0.54 ± 0.05 variance accounted for).
- EFP decoding performance was generally comparable to ECoG, with higher-resolution arrays yielding superior results. The 70-115 Hz spectral band was most informative for subtle movements.
Conclusions:
- High accuracy in decoding motor intent, necessary for fine motor control, may be achievable with both ECoG and EFPs.
- Epidural electrode placement is less invasive and carries lower risks than subdural placement.
- Accurate decoding of motor commands using EFPs represents a significant step towards clinically viable BMIs for restoring hand function.


