Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

On repeated screening tests.

T S Lau1

  • 1Department of Statistics, State University of New York, Buffalo, Amherst 14261.

Biometrics
|September 1, 1989
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study links quality control with repeated screening tests, offering a method to enhance test sensitivity and specificity. Likelihood ratios are highlighted for effectively measuring screening test performance, even with complex disease and diagnostic levels.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

First Search for B→X_{s}νν[over ¯] Decays.

Physical review letters·2026
Same author

Search for Feebly Interacting Particles in B Decays with Missing Energy at Belle.

Physical review letters·2026
Same author

Search for B^{0}→K^{*0}τ^{+}τ^{-} Decays at the Belle II Experiment.

Physical review letters·2025
Same author

Search for a Dark Higgs Boson Produced in Association with Inelastic Dark Matter at the Belle II Experiment.

Physical review letters·2025
Same author

Search for Lepton-Flavor-Violating Decay Modes B^{0}→K_{S}^{0}τ^{±}ℓ^{∓} with Hadronic B Tagging at Belle and Belle II.

Physical review letters·2025
Same author

Search for P_{cc[over ¯]s}(4459)^{0} and P_{cc[over ¯]s}(4338)^{0} in ϒ(1S,2S) Inclusive Decays at Belle.

Physical review letters·2025
Same journal

Fast penalized generalized estimating equations for large longitudinal functional datasets.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Causally-interpretable random-effects meta-analysis.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Statistical inference for mean function of partially observed functional time series.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Subgroup identification via Interaction Tree and Mixed Model for Repeated Measures with application to Alzheimer's disease.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Finite mixtures of linear quantile regressions with concomitant variables: a solution to endogeneity in longitudinal data modeling.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Discussion on "INTACT: a method for integration of longitudinal physical activity data from multiple sources" by Jingru Zhang, Erjia Cui, Hongzhe Li, and Haochang Shou.

Biometrics·2026
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Medical diagnostics
  • Statistical methods in medicine

Background:

  • Screening tests are crucial for early disease detection.
  • Ensuring the accuracy (sensitivity and specificity) of screening tests is a key challenge in quality control.
  • Existing methods for evaluating screening test performance may not adequately address complex disease and diagnostic categorizations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To establish a connection between quality control principles and the design of repeated screening tests.
  • To propose a practical framework for designing repeated screening tests that optimize sensitivity and specificity.
  • To explore the utility of likelihood ratios in assessing screening test performance, particularly in scenarios with multiple disease and diagnostic categories.

Main Methods:

  • Developing a theoretical framework linking quality control to repeated screening test design.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Utilizing likelihood ratios as a metric for evaluating test performance.
  • Investigating the application of these methods to scenarios involving polytomous (multi-level) disease and diagnostic classifications.

    • Main Results:

    • A practical methodology for designing repeated screening tests to achieve desired sensitivity and specificity levels is presented.
    • The benefits of employing likelihood ratios for quantifying screening test performance are demonstrated.
    • The study provides an approach for analyzing repeated screening tests with complex, multi-level disease and diagnostic outcomes.

    Conclusions:

    • Integrating quality control into the design of repeated screening tests can significantly improve diagnostic accuracy.
    • Likelihood ratios offer a robust and informative measure for evaluating screening test effectiveness, especially in complex clinical scenarios.
    • The proposed methods are applicable to a range of screening test evaluations, including those with polytomous disease and diagnostic levels.