Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The standard reply to the UKCC.

Norah C Casey1

  • 1Editor Nursing Standard.

British Journal of Nursing (Mark Allen Publishing)
|December 1, 2016
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This letter challenges the assumption that the UKCC heading indicates bias in the nursing press. It argues that singling out one journal may unfairly target specific publications.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same journal

Lymphoedema measurement methods in cancer survivors: accuracy, health economics and practice implications.

British journal of nursing (Mark Allen Publishing)·2026
Same journal

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: diagnosis, monitoring and chronic management in nursing practice.

British journal of nursing (Mark Allen Publishing)·2026
Same journal

Hydration risk assessment and fluid balance monitoring in older patients at a community hospital.

British journal of nursing (Mark Allen Publishing)·2026
Same journal

A 'stop-and-go' process.

British journal of nursing (Mark Allen Publishing)·2026
Same journal

Parenteral nutrition administration: what is it about gloves that causes so much controversy?

British journal of nursing (Mark Allen Publishing)·2026
Same journal

Combatting nutritional misinformation and providing guidance.

British journal of nursing (Mark Allen Publishing)·2026

Area of Science:

  • Nursing Media Studies
  • Journalism Ethics

Background:

  • A recent column questioned the UKCC heading in nursing publications.
  • The column suggested the heading implied bias within the nursing press.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To address and refute the claim of bias in the nursing press based on a specific heading.
  • To clarify the interpretation of the heading "Don't say yuck, say UKCC instead".

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of a specific column's claims regarding nursing press bias.
  • Examining the potential misinterpretation of a journal heading.

Main Results:

  • The assumption of bias based on the UKCC heading is presented as extreme and damaging.
  • The column's lack of broader citation suggests a potentially unfair focus on a single publication.

Related Experiment Videos

Conclusions:

  • The interpretation of the UKCC heading as indicative of bias is contested.
  • Readers may incorrectly infer a widespread issue within the nursing press due to narrow citation.