Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Auditory Perception01:17

Auditory Perception

1.4K
The auditory system is essential for sound perception, utilizing various critical structures. When sound waves enter the outer ear, they travel through the ear canal and cause the eardrum to vibrate. These vibrations are then transmitted to the middle ear, where three tiny bones – the malleus, incus, and stapes – amplify the sound. This amplification is crucial, as it ensures that the sound vibrations are strong enough to be conveyed to the inner ear. These vibrations then reach the...
1.4K
Tactile and Chemical Senses01:27

Tactile and Chemical Senses

1.2K
Tactile senses encompass touch, temperature, and pain, each mediated by specific receptors. Touch receptors detect mechanical energy or pressure against the skin. Sensory fibers from these receptors enter the spinal cord and relay information to the brain stem. Here, most fibers cross over to the opposite side of the brain. The touch information then moves to the thalamus, which projects a map of the body's surface onto the somatosensory areas of the parietal lobes in the cerebral cortex.
1.2K
Perceiving Loudness, Pitch, and Location01:21

Perceiving Loudness, Pitch, and Location

1.2K
The human brain perceives pitch through two primary mechanisms reflected in place theory and frequency theory. Each mechanism describes how sound waves are interpreted as specific pitches by the brain, offering insights into the intricate processes of auditory perception.
Place theory, or place coding, suggests that different pitches are heard because various sound waves activate specific locations along the cochlea's basilar membrane. The brain determines the pitch of a sound by...
1.2K
Perception of Sound Waves01:01

Perception of Sound Waves

5.9K
The human ear is not equally sensitive to all frequencies in the audible range. It may perceive sound waves with the same pressure but different frequencies as having different loudness. Moreover, the perception of sound waves depends on the health of an individual's ears, which decays with age. The health of one's ears may also be affected by regular exposure to loud noises.
The pitch of a sound depends on the frequency and the pressure amplitude of the source. Two sounds of the same...
5.9K
Sensory Perception: Organization of the Somatosensory System01:11

Sensory Perception: Organization of the Somatosensory System

11.7K
The somatosensory system is the central and peripheral nervous system component that senses and processes touch, pressure, pain, temperature, and body position or proprioception. The process of sensation takes place at three levels:
The receptor level:
The receptor level is the first stage of sensation. It involves the detection of a stimulus by specialized sensory receptors. The stimulus must arrive within the receptor's receptive field. Next, the receptor converts the energy of the...
11.7K
Motor and Sensory Areas of the Cortex01:14

Motor and Sensory Areas of the Cortex

8.7K
The cerebral cortex, the brain's outermost layer, is pivotal in processing complex cognitive tasks, emotions, and various sensory inputs and executing voluntary motor activities. This intricate structure is divided into three primary functional areas: the motor areas, sensory areas, and association areas.
Motor Areas
The motor areas located in the frontal lobe are central to controlling voluntary movements. This region is further subdivided into the primary motor cortex and the premotor cortex....
8.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Isolating fast and slow flows in three-dimensional fluid dynamics.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Velum movement in speech and inter-speech pause intervals: a cineradiographic study of French and English speech.

Phonetica·2025
Same author

Ethnokinesiology: towards a neuromechanical understanding of cultural differences in movement.

Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences·2024
Same author

Assessing ultrasound probe stabilization for quantifying speech production contrasts using the Adjustable Laboratory Probe Holder for UltraSound (ALPHUS).

Journal of phonetics·2024
Same author

Tonguedness in speech: Lateral bias in lingual bracing.

JASA express letters·2024
Same author

Hearing, seeing, and feeling speech: the neurophysiological correlates of trimodal speech perception.

Frontiers in human neuroscience·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 11, 2026

Applying Incongruent Visual-Tactile Stimuli during Object Transfer with Vibro-Tactile Feedback
05:43

Applying Incongruent Visual-Tactile Stimuli during Object Transfer with Vibro-Tactile Feedback

Published on: May 23, 2019

5.9K

Visual-tactile integration in speech perception: Evidence for modality neutral speech primitives.

Katie Bicevskis1, Donald Derrick2, Bryan Gick1

  • 1Department of Linguistics, University of British Columbia, Totem Field Studios (Main Department), 2613 West Mall, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z4, Canada.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
|December 3, 2016
PubMed
Summary

Multimodal speech perception integrates visual and tactile cues, similar to audio-visual and audio-tactile integration. This suggests speech perception primitives are modality-neutral, not just audio-based.

More Related Videos

Testing Sensory and Multisensory Function in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder
09:13

Testing Sensory and Multisensory Function in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder

Published on: April 22, 2015

17.2K
Assessment of Audio-Tactile Sensory Substitution Training in Participants with Profound Deafness Using the Event-Related Potential Technique
11:39

Assessment of Audio-Tactile Sensory Substitution Training in Participants with Profound Deafness Using the Event-Related Potential Technique

Published on: September 7, 2022

2.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 11, 2026

Applying Incongruent Visual-Tactile Stimuli during Object Transfer with Vibro-Tactile Feedback
05:43

Applying Incongruent Visual-Tactile Stimuli during Object Transfer with Vibro-Tactile Feedback

Published on: May 23, 2019

5.9K
Testing Sensory and Multisensory Function in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder
09:13

Testing Sensory and Multisensory Function in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder

Published on: April 22, 2015

17.2K
Assessment of Audio-Tactile Sensory Substitution Training in Participants with Profound Deafness Using the Event-Related Potential Technique
11:39

Assessment of Audio-Tactile Sensory Substitution Training in Participants with Profound Deafness Using the Event-Related Potential Technique

Published on: September 7, 2022

2.7K

Area of Science:

  • Speech perception research
  • Multimodal sensory integration
  • Auditory neuroscience

Background:

  • Audio-visual and audio-tactile stimuli enhance speech perception compared to audio alone.
  • Multimodal speech integration exhibits an asymmetric window, reflecting signal speeds.
  • Previous research established integration windows for audio-visual and audio-tactile speech.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate visual-tactile integration in speech perception.
  • To determine if tactile air puffs influence perception of visual speech stimuli.
  • To explore the timing of visual-tactile integration in speech.

Main Methods:

  • Participants viewed faces producing /pa/ and /ba/ syllables.
  • Synchronous and asynchronous air puffs were presented with visual stimuli.
  • Air puff timings varied up to 300ms before and after visual stimuli.
  • Participants identified the perceived syllable.

Main Results:

  • Air puffs increased the likelihood of perceiving /pa/.
  • A preference for air puffs following the visual signal was observed.
  • This timing preference aligns with the relative speeds of visual and air puff signals.
  • Visual-tactile integration demonstrated asymmetry, mirroring other multimodal speech studies.

Conclusions:

  • Visual-tactile integration in speech perception functions similarly to audio-visual and audio-tactile integration.
  • Speech perception is not solely audio-based but involves modality-neutral primitives.
  • Findings support a unified framework for multimodal speech perception.