Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Planar Rigid-Body Motion01:22

Planar Rigid-Body Motion

1.3K
Understanding the movement of a rigid body in planar motion involves recognizing that every particle within this body is traversing a path that maintains a consistent distance from a specific plane. This concept is fundamental in the study of physics and mechanical engineering, and it allows us to comprehend better how objects move in space.
Planar motion is typically divided into three distinct categories. The first is rectilinear translation, demonstrated by a subway train that moves along...
1.3K
Absolute Motion Analysis- General Plane Motion01:24

Absolute Motion Analysis- General Plane Motion

657
Visualize a drone, with its propellers spinning rapidly, hovering mid-air. The fascinating movements and operations of this drone can be comprehended by applying the principle of general plane motion.
As the drone's propellers rotate, an upward force is generated that counteracts the force of gravity, enabling the drone to lift off from the ground. This initial movement of the drone is along a straight path, representing a form of translational motion. In this phase, every point on the...
657
Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes01:25

Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes

1.0K
Consider a component AB undergoing a linear motion. Along with a linear motion, point B also rotates around point A. To comprehend this complex movement, position vectors for both points A and B are established using a stationary reference frame.
However, to express the relative position of point B relative to point A, an additional frame of reference, denoted as x'y', is necessary. This additional frame not only translates but also rotates relative to the fixed frame, making it...
1.0K
Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes-Problem Solving01:29

Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes-Problem Solving

811
Consider a crane whose telescopic boom rotates with an angular velocity of 0.04 rad/s and angular acceleration of 0.02 rad/s2. Along with the rotation, the boom also extends linearly with a uniform speed of 5 m/s. The extension of the boom is measured at point D, which is measured with respect to the fixed point C on the other end of the boom. For the given instant, the distance between points C and D is 60 meters.
Here, in order to determine the magnitude of velocity and acceleration for point...
811
Relative Motion Analysis - Velocity01:24

Relative Motion Analysis - Velocity

881
A stroke engine has a slider-crank mechanism that converts rotational motion from the crank into linear motion of the slider or vice versa. This mechanism consists of three main parts: the crank, the connecting rod, and the slider.
When an external force is exerted, it sets the crank into a rotational movement. This, in turn, instigates the motion of the connecting rod, leading to what is referred to as a general plane motion. This process involves two key points - point A on the connecting rod...
881
Relative Motion Analysis - Acceleration01:10

Relative Motion Analysis - Acceleration

991
A slider-crank mechanism converts rotational motion from the crank into linear motion of the slider or vice versa. This mechanism consists of three main parts: the crank, the connecting rod, and the slider. The movement of the slider-crank is an example of general plane motion as the fluctuating angle between the crank and the connecting rod. Consider a segment AB where point A is at the end of the slider and point B is on the diametrically opposite end to point A, on a crack. The variance in...
991

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Space Physiology and Technology: Adaptations, Countermeasures, and Opportunities for Wearable Systems.

Cyborg and bionic systems (Washington, D.C.)·2026
Same author

How individual vigor shapes human-human physical interaction.

eLife·2026
Same author

A modular architecture for trial-by-trial learning of redundant muscle activity patterns in novel sensorimotor tasks.

PLoS computational biology·2026
Same author

Model predictive game control for personalized and targeted interactive assistance.

Communications engineering·2026
Same author

Design and Preliminary Evaluation of a Torso Stabiliser for Individuals with Spinal Cord Injury.

Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference·2025
Same author

Switch-based Independent Antagonist Actuation with a Single Motor for a Soft Exosuit.

Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference·2025
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 11, 2026

The Impact of Motor Task Conditions on Goal-Directed Arm Reaching Kinematics and Trunk Compensation in Chronic Stroke Survivors
15:00

The Impact of Motor Task Conditions on Goal-Directed Arm Reaching Kinematics and Trunk Compensation in Chronic Stroke Survivors

Published on: May 2, 2021

4.1K

Motion Plan Changes Predictably in Dyadic Reaching.

Atsushi Takagi1, Niek Beckers2, Etienne Burdet1

  • 1Department of Bioengineering, Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, London, United Kingdom.

Plos One
|December 3, 2016
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Rigidly coupled pairs performing a joint reaching task showed consistent movements. A computational model revealed pre-programmed motion plans, independent of partner behavior, explain this coordination.

More Related Videos

Frame-by-Frame Video Analysis of Idiosyncratic Reach-to-Grasp Movements in Humans
10:51

Frame-by-Frame Video Analysis of Idiosyncratic Reach-to-Grasp Movements in Humans

Published on: January 15, 2018

8.9K
Assessing Corticospinal Excitability During Goal-Directed Reaching Behavior
05:05

Assessing Corticospinal Excitability During Goal-Directed Reaching Behavior

Published on: December 2, 2022

2.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 11, 2026

The Impact of Motor Task Conditions on Goal-Directed Arm Reaching Kinematics and Trunk Compensation in Chronic Stroke Survivors
15:00

The Impact of Motor Task Conditions on Goal-Directed Arm Reaching Kinematics and Trunk Compensation in Chronic Stroke Survivors

Published on: May 2, 2021

4.1K
Frame-by-Frame Video Analysis of Idiosyncratic Reach-to-Grasp Movements in Humans
10:51

Frame-by-Frame Video Analysis of Idiosyncratic Reach-to-Grasp Movements in Humans

Published on: January 15, 2018

8.9K
Assessing Corticospinal Excitability During Goal-Directed Reaching Behavior
05:05

Assessing Corticospinal Excitability During Goal-Directed Reaching Behavior

Published on: December 2, 2022

2.1K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Human motor control
  • Computational modeling

Background:

  • Human physical coordination, like walking, involves complex interactions.
  • Existing theories suggest real-time adjustments based on partner behavior drive coordinated movements.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the underlying mechanisms of joint reaching movements in rigidly coupled pairs.
  • To determine if partners update their motion plans based on each other's actions during a shared task.

Main Methods:

  • A joint reaching task was designed for rigidly coupled pairs.
  • Movement data was collected and analyzed across multiple trials.
  • A computational model was developed to simulate and interpret motion plans.

Main Results:

  • Joint reaching movements in rigidly coupled pairs were remarkably consistent across trials.
  • The computational model indicated that each partner maintained a distinct, pre-programmed motion plan.
  • These motion plans remained stable and did not adapt to the partner's behavior during the task.

Conclusions:

  • Rigidly coupled pairs achieve joint reaching through pre-programmed motor commands.
  • Partner behavior does not appear to influence motion plans in this specific rigidly coupled setup.
  • This suggests a reliance on internal, rather than interactive, control for synchronized movements in certain contexts.