Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Types of Selection01:46

Types of Selection

46.0K
Natural selection influences the frequencies of particular alleles and phenotypes within populations in several different ways. Primarily, natural selection can be directional, stabilizing, or disruptive. Directional selection favors one extreme trait and shifts the population towards that phenotype while selecting against individuals displaying alternate traits. Stabilizing selection favors an intermediate trait with a narrow range of variation. Deviation from the optimal phenotype towards an...
46.0K
Natural Selection and Mating Preferences01:06

Natural Selection and Mating Preferences

667
The principle of natural selection posits that organisms better adapted to their environment are more likely to survive and reproduce. This principle is closely intertwined with mating preferences, a key aspect of sexual selection, which evolutionary psychologists believe is driven by instincts to propagate one's genes. Such instincts significantly influence mating behaviors and preferences between genders.
Females, due to their biological roles in conception, pregnancy, and nursing,...
667
Frequency-dependent Selection01:21

Frequency-dependent Selection

24.4K
When the fitness of a trait is influenced by how common it is (i.e., its frequency) relative to different traits within a population, this is referred to as frequency-dependent selection. Frequency-dependent selection may occur between species or within a single species. This type of selection can either be positive—with more common phenotypes having higher fitness—or negative, with rarer phenotypes conferring increased fitness.
24.4K
What is Natural Selection?01:32

What is Natural Selection?

131.5K
Natural selection is an evolutionary process in which individuals with survival-promoting traits reproduce at higher rates. These favorable traits become more common within a population or species. Naturally selected traits initially arise via random genetic mutations. In order for selection to occur, there must be variation within a population, the trait controlling the variation must be heritable, and there must be an evolutionary advantage for variation in the trait.
131.5K
Mate Choice01:20

Mate Choice

11.9K
Mate choice—the decision about whom to mate with—is a type of natural selection, since animals must reproduce to pass down their genes. Mate choice is also called intersexual selection because the behavior occurs between the sexes.
11.9K
Limits to Natural Selection01:38

Limits to Natural Selection

35.7K
Organisms that are well-adapted to their environment are more likely to survive and reproduce. However, natural selection does not lead to perfectly adapted organisms. Several factors constrain natural selection.
35.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

IQ-TREE 3: phylogenomic inference software using complex evolutionary models.

Molecular biology and evolution·2026
Same author

Bayesian Selection of Relaxed-Clock Models: Distinguishing between Independent and Autocorrelated Rates.

Systematic biology·2024
Same author

Within-host diversity improves phylogenetic and transmission reconstruction of SARS-CoV-2 outbreaks.

eLife·2023
Same author

Genomic and geographical structure of human cytomegalovirus.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2023
Same author

Haplotype assignment of longitudinal viral deep sequencing data using covariation of variant frequencies.

Virus evolution·2022
Same author

Immune Imprinting Drives Human Norovirus Potential for Global Spread.

mBio·2022
Same journal

Sensing Underwater: Diversifying Selection, Convergent Evolution and Inactivation in Sensory Receptors' Genes of Aquatic Mammals.

Journal of molecular evolution·2026
Same journal

Synonymous Codons as Potential Contributors to Chromatin Stability and Gene Body Methylation in Plants.

Journal of molecular evolution·2026
Same journal

Convergent Functional Genomic Evolution Underlying Repeated Freshwater Colonization in Cetaceans.

Journal of molecular evolution·2026
Same journal

Conditions Enabling the Persistence of Cooperating Synthetase, Ligase, and Mutation-Inhibitor Catalytic Polymers.

Journal of molecular evolution·2026
Same journal

Lineage-Specific Diversification of Nucleoporin Nup98 Genes in Ciliates and Its Evolutionary Implications for the Nuclear Dualism.

Journal of molecular evolution·2026
Same journal

Mitochondrial Genome Evolution: The Influence of Partitioning, Calibration, and Gene Heterogeneity on Pleurodontan Substitution Rates.

Journal of molecular evolution·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 11, 2026

A Method for Selecting Structure-switching Aptamers Applied to a Colorimetric Gold Nanoparticle Assay
12:31

A Method for Selecting Structure-switching Aptamers Applied to a Colorimetric Gold Nanoparticle Assay

Published on: February 28, 2015

15.7K

Finding Direction in the Search for Selection.

Grant Thiltgen1, Mario Dos Reis2, Richard A Goldstein3

  • 1Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK.

Journal of Molecular Evolution
|December 4, 2016
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Detecting directional selection is crucial for understanding molecular evolution. A new method accurately identifies directional selection, unlike a standard diversifying selection test, while another shows potential for false positives.

Keywords:
Directional selectionDiversifying selectionPositive selectiond N/d S

More Related Videos

In Vitro Directed Evolution of a Restriction Endonuclease with More Stringent Specificity
09:16

In Vitro Directed Evolution of a Restriction Endonuclease with More Stringent Specificity

Published on: March 25, 2020

7.8K
Scalable High Throughput Selection From Phage-displayed Synthetic Antibody Libraries
12:55

Scalable High Throughput Selection From Phage-displayed Synthetic Antibody Libraries

Published on: January 17, 2015

19.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 11, 2026

A Method for Selecting Structure-switching Aptamers Applied to a Colorimetric Gold Nanoparticle Assay
12:31

A Method for Selecting Structure-switching Aptamers Applied to a Colorimetric Gold Nanoparticle Assay

Published on: February 28, 2015

15.7K
In Vitro Directed Evolution of a Restriction Endonuclease with More Stringent Specificity
09:16

In Vitro Directed Evolution of a Restriction Endonuclease with More Stringent Specificity

Published on: March 25, 2020

7.8K
Scalable High Throughput Selection From Phage-displayed Synthetic Antibody Libraries
12:55

Scalable High Throughput Selection From Phage-displayed Synthetic Antibody Libraries

Published on: January 17, 2015

19.4K

Area of Science:

  • Evolutionary biology
  • Molecular evolution
  • Genomics

Background:

  • Traditional positive selection tests focus on diversifying selection, favoring changes away from current amino acids.
  • Understanding directional selection, which favors specific amino acid shifts for increased fitness, is increasingly important.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the efficacy of methods for detecting directional selection.
  • To evaluate a standard diversifying selection test's ability to detect directional selection.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized evolutionary simulations and HIV drug resistance data as models for directional selection.
  • Compared two novel directional selection detection methods against each other and a standard diversifying selection method.

Main Results:

  • The standard diversifying selection test detected directional selection under specific conditions.
  • One directional selection method demonstrated high power and accuracy across various scenarios.
  • The second directional selection method produced a high rate of false positives.

Conclusions:

  • The evaluated directional selection method is a reliable tool for molecular evolution studies.
  • Researchers should exercise caution when using the less accurate directional selection method.
  • This work advances the molecular detection of adaptive evolutionary pressures.