Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Conservation of Protein Domains Over Different Proteins02:26

Conservation of Protein Domains Over Different Proteins

14.9K
Protein domains are small structurally independent units that are part of a single amino acid chain.  Although these domains are often structurally independent, they may rely on synergistic effects to perform their functions as part of a larger protein. Protein domains may be conserved within the same organism, as well as across different organisms.
A limited set of protein domains often duplicate and recombine during evolution. These domains can be organized in different combinations to...
14.9K
Protein Complexes with Interchangeable Parts01:57

Protein Complexes with Interchangeable Parts

3.0K
Groups of proteins may form a complex where each protein in this complex has a different role in the overall execution of the complex’s function. Often some of the proteins in the complex can be replaced by a closely related variant to give a complex that contains many of the same components yet is functionally distinct.
The SCF ubiquitin ligase is a protein complex of five individual proteins. This complex attaches ubiquitin to other target proteins to mark them for degradation. In order...
3.0K
Protein Complexes with Interchangeable Parts01:57

Protein Complexes with Interchangeable Parts

2.2K
2.2K
Conservation of Protein Domains02:26

Conservation of Protein Domains

4.3K
4.3K
Protein Complex Assembly02:41

Protein Complex Assembly

17.0K
Proteins can form homomeric complexes with another unit of the same protein or heteromeric complexes with different types.  Most protein complexes self-assemble spontaneously via ordered pathways, while some proteins need assembly factors that guide their proper assembly. Despite the crowded intracellular environment, proteins usually interact with their correct partners and form functional complexes.
Many viruses self-assemble into a fully functional unit using the infected host cell to...
17.0K
Protein Complex Assembly02:41

Protein Complex Assembly

2.6K
2.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Mapping functional dynamics hotspots for protein engineering with NMR peak intensity analysis.

Protein engineering, design & selection : PEDS·2026
Same author

Customizing the structure of minimal TIM barrels to craft efficient de novo enzymes.

Nature chemical biology·2026
Same author

Distal mutations enhance catalysis in designed enzymes by facilitating substrate binding and product release.

Nature communications·2025
Same author

Distal Mutations in a Designed Retro-Aldolase Alter Loop Dynamics to Shift and Accelerate the Rate-Limiting Step.

Journal of the American Chemical Society·2025
Same author

Distal mutations enhance catalysis in designed enzymes by facilitating substrate binding and product release.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025
Same author

How do you anticipate computational protein design will change biotechnology and therapeutic development?

Cell systems·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 11, 2026

Protein WISDOM: A Workbench for In silico De novo Design of BioMolecules
10:58

Protein WISDOM: A Workbench for In silico De novo Design of BioMolecules

Published on: July 25, 2013

17.7K

Multistate Computational Protein Design with Backbone Ensembles.

James A Davey1, Roberto A Chica2

  • 1Department of Chemistry and Biomolecular Sciences, University of Ottawa, 10 Marie-Curie, Ottawa, ON, Canada, K1N 6N5.

Methods in Molecular Biology (Clifton, N.J.)
|December 4, 2016
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Computational protein design (CPD) using multistate design (MSD) with backbone ensembles enhances accuracy over single-state design. MSD improves protein engineering by accounting for conformational flexibility, leading to better sequence identification.

Keywords:
Multistate analysisMultistate designPertMinProtein GProtein stability predictionReceiver operating characteristicSingle-state design

More Related Videos

Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins
05:08

Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins

Published on: July 8, 2025

1.2K
Incorporating Target Protein Structure Flexibility and Dynamics in Computational Drug Discovery Using Ensemble-Based Docking Analysis
08:49

Incorporating Target Protein Structure Flexibility and Dynamics in Computational Drug Discovery Using Ensemble-Based Docking Analysis

Published on: June 20, 2025

1.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 11, 2026

Protein WISDOM: A Workbench for In silico De novo Design of BioMolecules
10:58

Protein WISDOM: A Workbench for In silico De novo Design of BioMolecules

Published on: July 25, 2013

17.7K
Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins
05:08

Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins

Published on: July 8, 2025

1.2K
Incorporating Target Protein Structure Flexibility and Dynamics in Computational Drug Discovery Using Ensemble-Based Docking Analysis
08:49

Incorporating Target Protein Structure Flexibility and Dynamics in Computational Drug Discovery Using Ensemble-Based Docking Analysis

Published on: June 20, 2025

1.4K

Area of Science:

  • Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
  • Computational Biology
  • Protein Engineering

Background:

  • Computational protein design (CPD) is crucial for identifying novel protein sequences.
  • Single-state design (SSD) optimizes sequences on a single structure, but its fixed-backbone approach can reject viable sequences.
  • Conformational flexibility is a key limitation in traditional CPD methods.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present a comprehensive guide for implementing and analyzing multistate design (MSD) with backbone ensembles in CPD.
  • To demonstrate how MSD can overcome limitations of SSD by incorporating protein flexibility.
  • To compare the efficacy of MSD against SSD in predicting protein stability and function.

Main Methods:

  • Ensemble generation using the PertMin protocol to approximate protein conformational flexibility.
  • Execution of multistate design (MSD) calculations.
  • Recapitulation of Streptococcal protein G domain β1 mutant stability.
  • Analysis of computational predictions using sequence binning.

Main Results:

  • MSD calculations with backbone ensembles demonstrated improved accuracy in identifying desirable protein sequences compared to SSD.
  • The study successfully recapitulated mutant stability, validating the MSD approach.
  • Comparison revealed significant benefits of incorporating conformational flexibility in CPD.

Conclusions:

  • Multistate design (MSD) with backbone ensembles represents a significant advancement in computational protein design.
  • This approach enhances the reliability and scope of protein engineering by accounting for protein dynamics.
  • MSD offers a more robust method for identifying functional protein sequences in complex biological systems.