Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Lateralization01:28

Lateralization

1.2K
Brain lateralization refers to the division of mental processes and functions between the two hemispheres of the brain, a phenomenon that optimizes neural efficiency and underpins complex abilities in humans. This specialization allows each hemisphere to perform tasks where it has a comparative advantage, facilitating more refined cognitive capabilities across different domains.
1.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Low-frequency interaural time differences are resistant to across-frequency binaural interference across a range of overall levels.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same author

Binaural sensitivity and processing of envelope-based interaural difference cues by bilateral cochlear implant users with perilingual and postlingual onset of deafness.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same author

To Ear and Hearing Reviewers: Thank You.

Ear and hearing·2026
Same author

Best cochlear locations for delivering interaural timing cues in electric hearing.

Communications medicine·2026
Same author

To Ear and Hearing Reviewers: Thank You.

Ear and hearing·2026
Same author

The clinical effective of sodium/glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors on admission frequency, duration and use of acute non-invasive ventilation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A single-centre 24-month retrospective observational study in a UK tertiary care centre.

Clinical medicine (London, England)·2025
Same journal

Sibilant differentiation before and after tongue cancer surgery: Acoustics, kinematics and the role of sensorimotor controla).

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

BioNet-A: Ultrasonic echo representation network for target discrimination using active SONAR.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

Empty soft-drink cans and mass-loaded rods: Analogous homework problems from acoustic and mechanical domains.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

Erratum: Statistical wave field theory: Anisotropic wave fields under Neumann's boundary condition [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 159(3), 2265-2280 (2026)].

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

On the modification of tip leakage noise sources by porous treatment.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

An educational opportunity: Acoustics in an empty room.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 11, 2026

Enhancing Electrode Location Assessment in Cochlear Implantation via Computed Tomography Image Fusion
03:58

Enhancing Electrode Location Assessment in Cochlear Implantation via Computed Tomography Image Fusion

Published on: January 17, 2025

907

Spatial attention in bilateral cochlear-implant users.

Matthew J Goupell1, Alan Kan2, Ruth Y Litovsky2

  • 1Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742, USA.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
|December 5, 2016
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Cochlear-implant (CI) users struggle with speech in noise. While spatial separation helps, CI users show limited binaural unmasking benefits compared to normal-hearing listeners, likely due to peripheral processing limitations.

More Related Videos

Electrically Evoked Stapedius Reflex Measurements in Cochlear Implantation and Its Application in the Postoperative Fitting Process
07:00

Electrically Evoked Stapedius Reflex Measurements in Cochlear Implantation and Its Application in the Postoperative Fitting Process

Published on: June 21, 2024

1.6K
Sound Source Localization Testing in Single-sided Deafness Following Bone Conduction Intervention
04:32

Sound Source Localization Testing in Single-sided Deafness Following Bone Conduction Intervention

Published on: December 20, 2024

953

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 11, 2026

Enhancing Electrode Location Assessment in Cochlear Implantation via Computed Tomography Image Fusion
03:58

Enhancing Electrode Location Assessment in Cochlear Implantation via Computed Tomography Image Fusion

Published on: January 17, 2025

907
Electrically Evoked Stapedius Reflex Measurements in Cochlear Implantation and Its Application in the Postoperative Fitting Process
07:00

Electrically Evoked Stapedius Reflex Measurements in Cochlear Implantation and Its Application in the Postoperative Fitting Process

Published on: June 21, 2024

1.6K
Sound Source Localization Testing in Single-sided Deafness Following Bone Conduction Intervention
04:32

Sound Source Localization Testing in Single-sided Deafness Following Bone Conduction Intervention

Published on: December 20, 2024

953

Area of Science:

  • Auditory Neuroscience
  • Speech Perception
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • Cochlear-implant (CI) users experience significant challenges in understanding speech amidst background noise.
  • Binaural unmasking, the ability to improve speech intelligibility using two ears, is crucial for effective auditory perception.
  • The precise mechanisms limiting binaural unmasking in CI users remain unclear, with debate on peripheral versus central encoding contributions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether the limitations in binaural unmasking for cochlear-implant (CI) users are attributable to peripheral or central auditory processing.
  • To compare the binaural unmasking abilities of bilateral CI users with normal-hearing (NH) listeners under various acoustic conditions.

Main Methods:

  • Speech intelligibility was assessed in bilateral CI users with their clinical processors and in NH listeners using unprocessed or vocoded speech.
  • Stimuli were presented in monaural, diotic, and dichotic (opposite-ear) configurations to evaluate the effects of spatial separation between target speech and interfering sounds.
  • Performance was measured across different listening conditions to quantify binaural unmasking benefits.

Main Results:

  • All listener groups performed worst when target and interferer were presented monaurally or diotically (no spatial cues).
  • Improved performance was observed when target and interferer were spatially separated (opposite ears) for both CI and NH listeners.
  • However, CI users showed significantly smaller binaural benefits compared to NH listeners, especially in conditions simulating more realistic listening scenarios, with limited improvement when the interferer was diotic.

Conclusions:

  • Cochlear-implant users can utilize spatial cues to direct attention towards a target sound when it is presented to one ear and the masker to the other.
  • Significant limitations exist in achieving substantial binaural unmasking benefits for CI users in more complex listening environments.
  • These limitations are likely rooted in the imprecise peripheral encoding of auditory information by the cochlear implant, rather than solely central processing deficits.