Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 10, 2026

Improved Home Blood Pressure Control by CT-guided Ozone-mediated Renal Denervation for Patients with Resistant Hypertension
Published on: June 6, 2025
Should blood pressure goal be individualized in hypertensive patients?
Alexandra Yannoutsos1, Rania Kheder-Elfekih2, Jean-Michel Halimi3
1Unité Hypertension Artérielle, Prévention et Thérapeutique Cardiovasculaires, Centre de Diagnostic et de Thérapeutique, Université Paris Descartes, Hôpital Hôtel-Dieu, Paris, France.
Insights
Individualized blood pressure goals are crucial for hypertensive patients. Intensive treatment lowers risks, but real-world application requires careful consideration of measurement methods and patient-specific factors.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology and Hypertension Management
- Clinical Trial Analysis
- Evidence-Based Medicine
Background:
- Guidelines previously suggested lower blood pressure (BP) goals for high-risk hypertensive patients.
- Large-scale randomized trials lacked robust evidence to fully support these lower BP targets.
- The Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT) investigated intensive versus standard BP treatment targets.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the clinical relevance of individualized blood pressure (BP) goals in hypertensive patients.
- To assess the impact of age, comorbidities, and established cardiovascular disease on BP treatment targets.
- To evaluate the findings of the SPRINT trial in the context of real-world clinical practice.
Main Methods:
- Review of evidence from large-scale randomized trials, including the SPRINT trial.
- Analysis of SPRINT trial's intensive (120 mm Hg systolic BP) versus standard (140 mm Hg systolic BP) treatment arms.
- Consideration of measurement techniques, adverse event monitoring, and patient-specific factors in BP management.
Main Results:
- The SPRINT trial demonstrated a significantly lower rate of composite outcomes and all-cause mortality in the intensive treatment group.
- Automated office BP measurements in SPRINT may yield lower readings than routine measurements, suggesting a real-world target closer to 130 mm Hg systolic BP.
- Intensive BP lowering was associated with more frequent adverse events, raising safety concerns for specific patient populations.
Conclusions:
- While intensive BP lowering shows benefits, its application requires careful consideration of measurement methods and potential adverse events.
- Safety concerns, particularly for elderly, diabetic, or patients with established CV/renal disease, necessitate cautious approach.
- Individualized hypertension care should also prioritize antihypertensive medication choice and effective 24-hour BP control, including nighttime monitoring.
Abstract:
The aim of the present review is to consider the clinical relevance of individualized blood pressure (BP) goal under treatment in hypertensive patients according to their age, comorbidities or established cardiovascular (CV) disease. Evidence from large-scale randomized trials to support a lower BP goal, as initially recommended by guidelines in high-risk hypertensive patients, were lacking. Recently, the randomized intervention SPRINT trial studied two treatment targets for systolic BP (120mm Hg versus 140mm Hg in the intensive and standard treatment group, respectively) among high-risk hypertensive patients, without diabetes and without a history of prior stroke. The trial was stopped prematurely owing to a significantly lower rate of the primary composite outcome and all-cause mortality in the intensive treatment group. Several practical questions have to be considered. First, using an automated measurement system at an office visit during the SPRINT protocol, while the patient was seated alone after 5min of quiet rest, may likely have resulted in lower BP values than would normally be obtained with the routine BP measurement. A target systolic of 120mm Hg in SRPINT trial may be thus equated to a target systolic BP of 130mm Hg in the real-world office setting. Second, careful and repeated examinations of SPRINT participants may have led to fewer adverse events (more frequent in the intensive treatment group) than that expected in the real-world setting. The safety profile of this intensive treatment approach should therefore remain a matter of concern in clinical practice, especially in elderly patients, in diabetic patients or with established CV or renal disease. Orthostatic hypotension should alert the clinician to withhold up titration. Third, beyond the question of BP goal, choice of antihypertensive medication and effective 24-h BP control are important to consider in the context of BP-lowering strategy. In particular, ambulatory BP measurements and during nighttime should be considered for an individualized hypertension care.
Related Concept Videos
Hypertension V: Nursing Management
Hypertension I: Introduction
Hypertension IV: Drug Therapy and Lifestyle Modifications
Special considerations while measuring blood pressure
Monitoring Both Arms:
Monitoring BP in both arms during the initial assessment is advisable, as the systolic value may differ by five to ten mm Hg between arms. For subsequent BP assessments, use the arm with the higher reading.
Hypertension and Regulation of Blood Pressure
Assessment of blood pressure in brachial artery(one-step method)
Prepare for the Procedure:

