Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Framing Effects03:26

Framing Effects

8.0K
Information is everywhere and its presentation—such as how and when items are presented—can impact our perceptions and decisions surrounding the info. This broad concept umbrellas framing effects—influences that occur due to the way information is framed in its appearance, whether it’s purely the order or the specific wording of a message. Let’s take a look at numerous ways in which two versions of something can objectively say the same thing, yet we respond in...
8.0K
Social Proof00:52

Social Proof

32.6K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
32.6K
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

515
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
515
DNA as a Genetic Template02:05

DNA as a Genetic Template

28.3K
Two structural features of the DNA molecule provide a basis for the mechanisms of heredity: the four nucleotide bases and its double-stranded nature. The Watson-Crick model of double-helical DNA structure, proposed in 1952, drew heavily upon the X-ray crystallography work of researchers Rosalind Franklin and Maurice Wilkins. Watson, Crick, and Wilkins jointly received the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine for their work in 1962. Franklin was, controversially, excluded from the prize for...
28.3K
DNA Replication02:40

DNA Replication

62.8K
DNA replication involves the separation of the two strands of the double helix, with each strand serving as a template from which the new complementary strand is copied.  After replication, each double-stranded DNA includes one parental or “old” strand and one “new” strand. This is known as semiconservative replication. The resulting DNA molecules have the same sequence and are divided equally into the two daughter cells.
Replication in Prokaryotes
DNA replication...
62.8K
First Impression01:09

First Impression

299
First impressions play a crucial role in social perception, shaping how individuals assess others in professional, academic, and interpersonal contexts. Psychological research highlights the significance of cognitive biases, such as the primacy and recency effects, which influence how people interpret and recall information.The Primacy Effect and Cognitive AnchoringThe primacy effect describes the tendency for initial information to impact judgment disproportionately. When individuals encounter...
299

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Co-Designing a Social Media and Anxiety Survey: Reflections on the Importance of Centring Mental Health Lived Experience Expertise.

Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy·2026
Same author

Interpersonal Goal Contagion Through Social Media Posts.

Cyberpsychology, behavior and social networking·2025
Same author

Why Do People Sometimes Wear an Anonymous Mask? Motivations for Seeking Anonymity Online.

Personality & social psychology bulletin·2023
Same author

A functionalist approach to online trolling.

Frontiers in psychology·2023
Same author

Compassionate Goals, Facebook Use, and Subjective Well-Being: Examining the Roles of Relationship Maintenance and Connectedness.

Cyberpsychology, behavior and social networking·2022
Same author

The Disinhibiting Effects of Anonymity Increase Online Trolling.

Cyberpsychology, behavior and social networking·2022

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 10, 2026

Isolation of Fidelity Variants of RNA Viruses and Characterization of Virus Mutation Frequency
18:10

Isolation of Fidelity Variants of RNA Viruses and Characterization of Virus Mutation Frequency

Published on: June 16, 2011

30.2K

Replication Rate, Framing, and Format Affect Attitudes and Decisions about Science Claims.

Ralph M Barnes1, Stephanie J Tobin2, Heather M Johnston3

  • 1Department of Psychology, Montana State University Bozeman, MT, USA.

Frontiers in Psychology
|December 7, 2016
PubMed
Summary

Replication rates and positive framing enhance scientific finding evaluations. Framing effects were stronger than replication rates, with natural frequencies slightly reducing framing impact.

Keywords:
framingnatural frequenciesprobability judgmentspublic perception of sciencereplicationrepresentation of information

More Related Videos

Understanding the Impact of Temperate Bacteriophages on Their Lysogens Through Transcriptomics
09:23

Understanding the Impact of Temperate Bacteriophages on Their Lysogens Through Transcriptomics

Published on: January 5, 2024

2.7K
Measuring Microbial Mutation Rates with the Fluctuation Assay
07:44

Measuring Microbial Mutation Rates with the Fluctuation Assay

Published on: November 28, 2019

25.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 10, 2026

Isolation of Fidelity Variants of RNA Viruses and Characterization of Virus Mutation Frequency
18:10

Isolation of Fidelity Variants of RNA Viruses and Characterization of Virus Mutation Frequency

Published on: June 16, 2011

30.2K
Understanding the Impact of Temperate Bacteriophages on Their Lysogens Through Transcriptomics
09:23

Understanding the Impact of Temperate Bacteriophages on Their Lysogens Through Transcriptomics

Published on: January 5, 2024

2.7K
Measuring Microbial Mutation Rates with the Fluctuation Assay
07:44

Measuring Microbial Mutation Rates with the Fluctuation Assay

Published on: November 28, 2019

25.2K

Area of Science:

  • Psychology
  • Science Communication

Background:

  • Evaluating scientific findings is crucial for public trust and policy.
  • Understanding how information presentation influences scientific judgment is key.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how replication rates, framing (positive/negative), and numeric format (percentage/natural frequency) affect the evaluation of scientific findings.
  • To determine the relative impact of replication information and its presentation on attitudes towards scientific claims.

Main Methods:

  • Five experiments were conducted with a total of 2480 participants (undergraduate students and U.S. adults).
  • Dependent measures included attitude difference scores and choice.
  • Independent variables were replication rate, frame (positive/negative), and numeric format (percentage/natural frequency).

Main Results:

  • Positive attitudes towards scientific findings increased with higher replication rates.
  • Positive framing of replication information led to more favorable evaluations than negative framing.
  • Framing had a larger impact on attitudes than the replication rate itself.
  • Natural frequencies attenuated the framing effect compared to percentages in some experiments.

Conclusions:

  • The way replication information is framed significantly influences the evaluation of scientific findings, often more than the actual replication rate.
  • Positive framing enhances acceptance of scientific results.
  • While natural frequencies may slightly reduce framing effects, framing remains a dominant factor.