Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 10, 2026
A Comparative Study of Drug Delivery Methods Targeted to the Mouse Inner Ear: Bullostomy Versus Transtympanic Injection
Published on: March 8, 2017
A comparison between systemic and intratympanic steroid therapies as initial therapy for idiopathic sudden
Qingfen Qiang1,2, Xuewen Wu1,2, Tao Yang3
1a Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery , Xiangya Hospital, Central South University , Changsha , Hunan , PR China.
Conclusions:
Intratympanic steroid (ITS) treatment groups exhibited better outcomes in PTA improvement and recovery rate than systemic steroid therapy (SST) groups. Whether initial hearing loss severity would influence the PTA improvement and recovery rate still requires further research.
Objective:
This article was aimed at evaluating whether intratympanic steroid (ITS) treatment would provide benefits over systemic steroid therapy (SST) as initial therapy in patients with idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (ISSHL). A meta-analysis was carried out based on published RCTs that included the hearing outcomes of ITS treatment and SST in ISSHL as initial therapy. Both PTA differences and recovery rate were analyzed.
Methods:
The literature search was based on the online database including Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane trails, which completed in July 2016. This study extracted the relevant data following the selection criteria. Mean difference (MD) of PTA differences and Odds ratio (OR) of recovery rate were calculated within 95% confidence intervals.
Results:
Six eligible articles were reviewed. The pooled MDs of PTA differences was 3.42 (95% CI = 0.17-6.67, p = .04) and the pooled ORs of recovery rate was 2.05 (95% CI = 1.38-3.03, p = .0003), which indicated that ITS treatment yielded better PTA improvement than SST. Sub-group analyses based on the initial hearing loss were also conducted; however, the difference was insignificant according to our analysis results (p = .82 for PTA improvement and p = .26 for recovery rate).
