Abducens Nerve Palsy Following Expansion Cranioplasty with Distraction Osteogenesis

Hyungyu Yoo1, Seung Ah Chung2, Soo Han Yoon3

  • 1Department of Ophthalmology, Ajou University School of MedicineSuwonKorea; 521st Air Defense Artillery Battalion, Republic of Korea Air ForcePyeongtaekKorea.

Insights

Childhood abducens nerve palsy, or sixth nerve palsy, can have many causes. This study reports two cases of temporary sixth nerve palsy following trans-sutural distraction osteogenesis (TSuDO) for craniosynostosis.

Area of Science:

  • Ophthalmology
  • Pediatric Neurosurgery
  • Craniofacial Surgery

Background:

  • Childhood abducens nerve palsy (CNP) is a common cause of strabismus, with diverse etiologies including trauma, tumors, and idiopathic factors.
  • Trans-sutural distraction osteogenesis (TSuDO) is a surgical technique used to correct craniosynostosis by gradually expanding the skull.
  • Sixth nerve palsy, characterized by a deficit in eye abduction, can manifest for various reasons in pediatric patients.

Observation:

  • Two pediatric patients developed unilateral abduction deficit after undergoing TSuDO for craniosynostosis.
  • The abduction deficit, indicative of potential sixth nerve palsy, was observed following the distractor removal phase of the TSuDO procedure.
  • No specific intervention was required as the condition was monitored postoperatively.

Findings:

  • The observed abduction deficits in both patients resolved spontaneously within 2-4 months after the removal of the distractors.
  • This represents the first documented instance of sixth nerve palsy occurring as a complication of TSuDO surgery.
  • The transient nature of the palsy suggests a temporary mechanical or inflammatory effect related to the TSuDO device or procedure.

Implications:

  • This finding highlights a potential, albeit temporary, neurological complication associated with TSuDO in pediatric craniosynostosis repair.
  • Ophthalmologists and craniofacial surgeons should be aware of this possible adverse event and consider it in the differential diagnosis of abduction deficits post-TSuDO.
  • Further research may be warranted to elucidate the exact mechanism and determine if preventative measures can be implemented for TSuDO procedures.