Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 10, 2026

Author Spotlight: Exploring Venous Waveforms in Porcine Models to Tackle Volume Overload in Medicine
Published on: January 12, 2024
Measuring reproducibility of dose response data for the Pig-a assay using covariate benchmark dose analysis
George E Johnson1, Mika Yamamoto2, Yuta Suzuki3
1Swansea University Medical School, Swansea University, SA2 8PP, United Kingdom.
Abstract:
The reproducibility of the in vivo Pig-a gene mutation test system was assessed across 13 different Japanese laboratories. In each laboratory rats were exposed to the same dosing regimen of N-nitroso-N-ethylurea (ENU), and red blood cells (RBCs) and reticulocytes (RETs) were collected for mutant phenotypic analysis using flow cytometry. Mutant frequency dose response data were analysed using the PROAST benchmark dose (BMD) statistical package. Laboratory was used as a covariate during the analysis to allow all dose responses to be analysed at the same time, with conserved shape parameters. This approach has recently been shown to increase the precision of the BMD analysis, as well as providing a measure of equipotency. This measure of equipotency was used here to demonstrate a reasonable level of interlaboratory reproducibility. Increased reproducibility could have been achieved by increasing the number of cells scored, as this would reduce the number of zero values within the mutant frequency data. Overall, the interlaboratory trial was successful, and these findings support the transferability of the in vivo Pig-a gene mutation assay.
Related Concept Videos
Bioavailability Study Design: Single Versus Multiple Dose Studies
Bioequivalence Data: Statistical Interpretation
Dose Response Curve: Conventional Versus Nonmonotonic
Measurement of Bioavailability: Pharmacodynamic Methods
Toxicity Testing in Animals
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...

