Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Blinding01:11

Blinding

4.0K
Blinding is a commonly used method of not telling participants which treatment a subject is receiving. Blinding is a critical part of a randomized control trial or RCT. It reduces the bias that affects the results. In an RCT, blinding is used in the form of a placebo. A placebo effect occurs when untreated subjects falsely believe they have received the treatment and report improved symptoms. A placebo or a dummy treatment is administered to subjects to negate the bias caused by such an effect.
4.0K
Blind Procedures02:07

Blind Procedures

13.8K
Ideally, the people who observe and record the children’s behavior are unaware of who was assigned to the experimental or control group, in order to control for experimenter bias. Experimenter bias refers to the possibility that a researcher’s expectations might skew the results of the study. Remember, conducting an experiment requires a lot of planning, and the people involved in the research project have a vested interest in supporting their hypotheses. If the observers knew which...
13.8K
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

515
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
515
Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

1.5K
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:  
1.5K
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

520
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
520
Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

9.2K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
9.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A Mendelian randomization analysis of cardiac MRI measurements as surrogate outcomes for heart failure and atrial fibrillation.

Communications medicine·2025
Same author

Influence of stressful life events and personality traits on PLN cardiomyopathy severity: an exploratory study.

Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology·2024
Same author

Identifying and ranking novel independent features for cardiovascular disease prediction in people with type 2 diabetes.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2023
Same author

DCM-PROGRESS: predicting end-stage heart failure in non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy patients.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2023
Same author

Circulating Acylcarnitines Associated with Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Severity: an Exploratory Cross-Sectional Study in MYBPC3 Founder Variant Carriers.

Journal of cardiovascular translational research·2023
Same author

Mendelian randomization with Egger pleiotropy correction and weakly informative Bayesian priors.

International journal of epidemiology·2017

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 10, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

15.4K

Adjusting for bias in unblinded randomized controlled trials.

A F Schmidt1, Rhh Groenwold2

  • 11 Institute of Cardiovascular Science, Faculty of Population Health, University College London, London, UK.

Statistical Methods in Medical Research
|December 10, 2016
PubMed
Summary

A new method, Egger Correction for non-Adherence, reduces bias in treatment effect estimation when trial participants are unblinded. However, it lacks precision and power, suggesting its use primarily for sensitivity analysis in meta-analyses.

Keywords:
Monte Carlo methodStatisticsbiasinstrumental variablerandomized controlled trialstreatment effectiveness

More Related Videos

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
04:53

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition

Published on: September 20, 2019

11.4K
Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

1.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 10, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

15.4K
A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
04:53

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition

Published on: September 20, 2019

11.4K
Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

1.3K

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Clinical Trials Methodology
  • Epidemiology

Background:

  • Blinding in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) is crucial for unbiased treatment effect estimation.
  • Participant unblinding can introduce significant bias into treatment effect estimators.
  • Existing methods may not adequately address bias arising from non-adherence and unblinding.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce and evaluate a novel instrumental variable meta-analysis method, the Egger Correction for non-Adherence.
  • To compare the performance of this new method against intention-to-treat, as-treated, and conventional instrumental variable estimators.
  • To assess the method's effectiveness under various scenarios including non-adherence, confounding, and heterogeneity.

Main Methods:

  • Simulation studies were employed to compare different estimators.
  • The study focused on binary endpoints quantified by risk difference.
  • The novel method was adapted from genetic research for instrumental variable meta-analysis.

Main Results:

  • The Egger Correction for non-Adherence demonstrated the least bias in scenarios with unblinded treatment allocation.
  • However, the method exhibited low precision and power, especially when adherence variation was not substantial.
  • Power for the Egger Correction for non-Adherence was at most 0.14, compared to 1.00 for conventional IV in blinded meta-analyses.

Conclusions:

  • The Egger Correction for non-Adherence is a promising method for reducing bias in unblinded RCT meta-analyses.
  • Its current limitations in precision and power suggest its primary utility as a sensitivity analysis tool.
  • Further research may be needed to improve the precision and power of this novel bias-adjustment method.