Gram positive and Gram negative bacteria differ in their sensitivity to cold plasma
Anne Mai-Prochnow1, Maryse Clauson1,2, Jungmi Hong1,3
1CSIRO Manufacturing, PO Box 218, Lindfield NSW 2070 Australia.
Scientific Reports
|December 10, 2016
Summary
Cold atmospheric-pressure plasma (CAP) effectively kills bacteria, with efficacy linked to cell wall thickness. Thicker walls in Gram-positive bacteria like Bacillus subtilis show more resistance to CAP treatment than thinner walls in Gram-negative species.
Area of Science:
- Microbiology
- Plasma Physics
- Biophysics
Background:
- Cold atmospheric-pressure plasma (CAP) is an emerging technology for antimicrobial applications.
- The precise mechanisms underlying CAP's antimicrobial activity are not fully understood.
- Bacterial cell wall characteristics are known to influence susceptibility to various antimicrobial agents.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the correlation between bacterial cell wall thickness and the efficacy of cold atmospheric-pressure plasma (CAP).
- To explore how cell wall properties influence CAP's antimicrobial activity across different bacterial species and growth conditions.
Main Methods:
- Exposure of bacterial biofilms and planktonic cultures (Gram-positive and Gram-negative species) to CAP for 10 minutes.
- Measurement of bacterial reduction using log10 reduction.
- Analysis of bacterial cell wall thickness using nanometer measurements.
- Characterization of plasma emission spectra to identify reactive species (e.g., OH, O).
Main Results:
- Bacterial inactivation by CAP was directly correlated with cell wall thickness.
- Gram-positive Bacillus subtilis (55.4 nm cell wall) exhibited high resistance to CAP, with <1 log10 reduction.
- Gram-negative Pseudomonas aeruginosa (2.4 nm cell wall) biofilms were nearly eradicated under identical CAP treatment.
- Planktonic Gram-negative bacteria showed greater CAP susceptibility than Gram-positive bacteria.
- Mixed-species biofilms demonstrated higher resistance in Gram-positive species, though co-cultured P. aeruginosa showed increased overall resistance.
Conclusions:
- Bacterial cell wall thickness is a significant factor determining CAP efficacy.
- While cell wall thickness correlates with inactivation times, other factors like cell membranes and biofilm matrix likely contribute to CAP resistance.
- The presence of reactive oxygen and hydroxyl species in CAP suggests a mechanism involving structural cell wall damage.
Related Concept Videos
Bacterial Cell Wall
4.9K
The bacterial cell wall is an essential structural component that encases the plasma membrane, preserving cellular integrity, determining shape, and protecting against osmotic stress. This rigid yet flexible structure primarily comprises peptidoglycan, a polymer that forms a mesh-like matrix conferring mechanical strength and flexibility.Peptidoglycan Composition and StructurePeptidoglycan, the core of the bacterial cell wall, comprises alternating units of N-acetylglucosamine (NAG) and...
4.9K
Factors Influencing Microbial Growth: Temperature
1.7K
Microorganisms display remarkable adaptations, enabling them to thrive in diverse ecological niches across a wide range of temperatures. Temperature profoundly influences microbial growth by affecting enzymatic activity, membrane fluidity, and other cellular processes.Each microorganism operates within a specific temperature range defined by three cardinal points: minimum, optimum, and maximum. Below the minimum temperature, membranes lose fluidity, halting transport processes. Above the...
1.7K
Differential Staining Technique
2.7K
Differential staining is an essential microbiological technique that exploits variations in cell wall structures to classify and identify microorganisms. It facilitates the distinction of bacteria, aiding in diagnostic and research applications. Two of the most widely used differential staining methods are Gram staining and acid-fast staining, both of which rely on the chemical and structural differences in bacterial cell walls.Gram Staining TechniqueGram staining differentiates bacteria by...
2.7K
Antibiotic Selection
61.8K
Overview
61.8K
Physical Methods for Controlling Microbial Growth: Temperature
1.4K
Heat is a widely used method to control microbial growth by targeting and denaturing cellular proteins, thereby killing or inactivating microbes. This method's effectiveness is quantified using parameters such as the thermal death point (TDP), thermal death time (TDT), and decimal reduction time (D value). TDP represents the lowest temperature at which all microorganisms in a liquid suspension are eliminated within 10 minutes, whereas TDT is the time necessary to achieve sterilization at a...
1.4K
Physical Methods for Controlling Microbial Growth: Radiation and Filtration
1.4K
Radiation and filtration are essential tools for microbial control, targeting microorganisms through distinct mechanisms. Radiation eliminates microbes by damaging their DNA, either killing them or inhibiting their growth. Based on wavelength, radiation is classified into two types: nonionizing and ionizing radiation.Non-ionizing radiation, such as UV radiation (200–400 nm), is absorbed by DNA, causing defects that effectively disinfect surfaces, air, and water, including safety cabinets.
1.4K


