Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 10, 2026
07:22
A Standardized Procedure of Dressing Management for Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis
Published on: March 14, 2025
1.3K
Evaluation of a hydrocolloid dressing
M Schmitt1, Nancy P Vergnes2, J P Canarelli3
1Head of paediatric surgery, Children's Hospital.
Journal of Wound Care
|December 10, 2016
Summary
Hydrocolloid dressings and skin tapes showed similar effectiveness for children's surgical wounds. Both methods resulted in satisfactory healing and cosmetic outcomes with no reported adverse events.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Surgery
- Wound Care
- Dermatology
Background:
- Postoperative wound management in children requires effective and safe closure methods.
- Adhesive skin tapes are a common method for wound closure.
- Hydrocolloid dressings offer potential benefits for wound healing and protection.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy and safety of hydrocolloid dressings versus adhesive skin tapes for pediatric postoperative wound closure.
- To evaluate wound healing, dehiscence rates, and cosmetic outcomes.
Main Methods:
- A randomized controlled trial involving 170 children across nine surgical centers.
- Children were allocated to either a hydrocolloid dressing group or an adhesive skin tape (control) group.
- Wound closure, dehiscence, maceration, infection, and adverse events were assessed.
Main Results:
- Both hydrocolloid dressings and skin tapes achieved satisfactory skin closure.
- Healthy closures without dehiscence were observed in 89.4% of the hydrocolloid group and 95.3% of the control group.
- No product-related maceration, infection, or adverse events were reported; cosmetic results were satisfactory in both groups.
Conclusions:
- Hydrocolloid dressings are a safe and effective alternative to adhesive skin tapes for pediatric postoperative wound care.
- The choice of dressing may be influenced by the type of surgical procedure to minimize dehiscence.
- Both methods provide good cosmetic outcomes for pediatric surgical wounds.
