Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 10, 2026

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

9.3K

Reducing error and blame in practice

    The Veterinary Record
    |December 10, 2016
    PubMed

    Insights

    Checklists can help reduce human error in veterinary and medical settings. Evidence supports their use, though they are not a complete solution for all challenges.

    Area of Science:

    • Veterinary Medicine
    • Medical Practice
    • Patient Safety

    Background:

    • Human error is a significant concern in healthcare.
    • Checklists are increasingly recognized as a tool to mitigate errors.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To discuss the efficacy of checklists in veterinary and medical practice.
    • To evaluate the evidence supporting the use of checklists.

    Main Methods:

    • Discussion at the BVA Congress and London Vet Show.
    • Presentation of evidence by speakers.

    Main Results:

    • Checklists show value in overcoming human error.
    • Evidence supports the implementation of checklists.

    Conclusions:

    • Checklists are a valuable tool for improving safety.
    • While not a panacea, checklists offer demonstrable benefits.

    Related Concept Videos

    Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

    Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

    In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
    Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
    11.2K
    Contaminants and Errors01:16

    Contaminants and Errors

    Effective sample preparation is crucial for accurate and reliable laboratory analysis. During this process, two significant sources of error can arise: concentration bias from improper sample splitting and contamination caused by methods used to reduce particle size, such as grinding or homogenization. Identifying and minimizing these potential errors is crucial to ensuring the validity of the analysis.
    Another key consideration is determining the appropriate number of samples required to...
    445
    Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

    Bias in Epidemiological Studies

    Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:  
    1.5K
    Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization01:12

    Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization

    Error is the deviation of the obtained result from the true, expected value or the estimated central value. Errors are expressed in absolute or relative terms.
    Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
    Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
    Systematic or...
    11.7K
    Bias01:22

    Bias

    Bias refers to any tendency that prevents a question from being considered unprejudiced. In research, bias occurs when one outcome or answer is selected or encouraged over others in sampling or testing. Bias can occur during any research phase, including study design, data collection, analysis, and publication.
    In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
    7.9K
    Halo Effect01:27

    Halo Effect

    The halo effect is a cognitive bias in which an individual's overall impression influences judgments about their specific traits. This psychological phenomenon leads people to associate positive characteristics with those they perceive as generally good and negative characteristics with those they view as bad. This effect is particularly influential in social perception, professional evaluations, and decision-making processes.The Psychological Basis of the Halo EffectThe halo effect is rooted...
    589