Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Conserved Binding Sites01:49

Conserved Binding Sites

5.3K
Many proteins’ biological role depends on their interactions with their ligands, small molecules that bind to specific locations on the protein known as ligand-binding sites. Ligand-binding sites are often conserved among homologous proteins as these sites are critical for protein function.
Binding sites are often located in large pockets, and if their location on a protein’s surface is unknown, it can be predicted using various approaches. The energetic method computationally...
5.3K
Protein Complexes with Interchangeable Parts01:57

Protein Complexes with Interchangeable Parts

3.0K
Groups of proteins may form a complex where each protein in this complex has a different role in the overall execution of the complex’s function. Often some of the proteins in the complex can be replaced by a closely related variant to give a complex that contains many of the same components yet is functionally distinct.
The SCF ubiquitin ligase is a protein complex of five individual proteins. This complex attaches ubiquitin to other target proteins to mark them for degradation. In order...
3.0K
Regulation of the Unfolded Protein Response01:31

Regulation of the Unfolded Protein Response

3.1K
Inositol-requiring kinase one or IRE1 is the most conserved eukaryotic unfolded protein response (UPR) receptor. It is a type I transmembrane protein kinase receptor with a distinctive site-specific RNase activity. As the binding mechanics of the misfolded proteins with the N-terminal domain of IRE-1 are unclear, three binding models — direct, indirect, and allosteric -- are proposed for receptor activation. Nevertheless, it is known that once a misfolded protein associates with IRE1, it...
3.1K
Protein-protein Interfaces02:04

Protein-protein Interfaces

14.9K
Many proteins form complexes to carry out their functions, making protein-protein interactions (PPIs) essential for an organism's survival. Most PPIs are stabilized by numerous weak noncovalent chemical forces. The physical shape of the interfaces determines the way two proteins interact. Many globular proteins have closely-matching shapes on their surfaces, which form a large number of weak bonds. Additionally, many PPIs occur between two helices or between a surface cleft and a...
14.9K
Assembly of Signaling Complexes01:30

Assembly of Signaling Complexes

6.9K
Multiprotein signaling complexes are formed in a dynamic process involving protein-protein interactions at the cytoplasmic domain of transmembrane receptors or enzymatic and non-enzymatic proteins associated with the receptor. These complexes ensure the activation and propagation of intracellular signals that regulate cell functions.
Interaction domains in cell signaling
Interaction domains recognize exposed features of their binding partners containing post-translationally modified sequences,...
6.9K
Directing Proteins to the Rough Endoplasmic Reticulum01:34

Directing Proteins to the Rough Endoplasmic Reticulum

18.2K
The organelle-specific signaling sequences direct proteins synthesized in the cytosol to their final destination like ER, mitochondria, peroxisomes, etc. Some of the proteins directed to ER are then trafficked via vesicles to other organelles within the cell or the extracellular environment through the Golgi complex. For example, the rough ER synthesizes soluble proteins for transportation to the lysosomes or secretion out of the cell. It can also synthesize transmembrane proteins that can...
18.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Claudin 24-A novel enhancer of AMPA receptor fidelity.

Science advances·2026
Same author

Unraveling the Impact of KRAS Accessory Proteins on Oncogenic Signaling Pathways.

Cells·2026
Same author

Advances and Challenges in KRAS Mutation Detection and Clinical Implications.

Cancers·2026
Same author

IGF-1 promotes cell surface expression of HCN4 pacemaker channels contributing to tachycardia.

Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology·2025
Same author

New insights into the classification of the RAC1 P29S hotspot mutation in melanoma as an oncogene.

Cancer gene therapy·2025
Same author

From Quiescence to Activation: The Reciprocal Regulation of Ras and Rho Signaling in Hepatic Stellate Cells.

Cells·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 10, 2026

Author Spotlight: A Computational Approach to Decipher Amino Acid Preferences in Multispecific Protein-Protein Interactions
06:50

Author Spotlight: A Computational Approach to Decipher Amino Acid Preferences in Multispecific Protein-Protein Interactions

Published on: January 26, 2024

2.7K

The RAS-Effector Interface: Isoform-Specific Differences in the Effector Binding Regions.

Hossein Nakhaeizadeh1, Ehsan Amin1, Saeideh Nakhaei-Rad1

  • 1Institute of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology II, Medical Faculty of the Heinrich-Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany.

Plos One
|December 10, 2016
PubMed
Summary

This study details RAS protein interactions with effector proteins, revealing key binding regions. Findings highlight a central β-sheet interaction and specific contact determinants for RAS and RRAS isoforms.

More Related Videos

Fluorescence Anisotropy as a Tool to Study Protein-protein Interactions
10:44

Fluorescence Anisotropy as a Tool to Study Protein-protein Interactions

Published on: October 21, 2016

31.8K
Förster Resonance Energy Transfer Mapping: A New Methodology to Elucidate Global Structural Features
07:09

Förster Resonance Energy Transfer Mapping: A New Methodology to Elucidate Global Structural Features

Published on: March 16, 2022

3.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 10, 2026

Author Spotlight: A Computational Approach to Decipher Amino Acid Preferences in Multispecific Protein-Protein Interactions
06:50

Author Spotlight: A Computational Approach to Decipher Amino Acid Preferences in Multispecific Protein-Protein Interactions

Published on: January 26, 2024

2.7K
Fluorescence Anisotropy as a Tool to Study Protein-protein Interactions
10:44

Fluorescence Anisotropy as a Tool to Study Protein-protein Interactions

Published on: October 21, 2016

31.8K
Förster Resonance Energy Transfer Mapping: A New Methodology to Elucidate Global Structural Features
07:09

Förster Resonance Energy Transfer Mapping: A New Methodology to Elucidate Global Structural Features

Published on: March 16, 2022

3.1K

Area of Science:

  • Molecular biology
  • Biochemistry
  • Structural biology

Background:

  • RAS proteins are key regulators of intracellular signaling pathways.
  • RAS effector interactions are crucial for transmitting extracellular signals.
  • A comprehensive understanding of RAS-effector molecular interactions remains incomplete.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate structure-function relationships in RAS-effector interactions.
  • To systematically analyze binding affinities and identify critical interaction determinants.
  • To provide new insights into the molecular recognition mechanisms between RAS proteins and their effectors.

Main Methods:

  • In vitro binding assays using fluorescence polarization to determine equilibrium dissociation constants.
  • In silico analysis combining in vitro data with crystal structure information.
  • Construction of an interaction matrix to identify critical interaction hotspots.

Main Results:

  • Quantified binding affinities for HRAS, KRAS, NRAS, RRAS1, and RRAS2 with various RAS binding (RB) and RAS association (RA) domains.
  • Identified interaction hotspots critical for RAS-effector binding.
  • Dissected hotspots into five distinct regions (R1-R5), revealing conserved and variable elements across effectors.
  • Proposed intermolecular β-sheet interaction in R1 as a central recognition region and R3 for isoform-specific contacts.

Conclusions:

  • RAS-effector interactions are governed by specific molecular determinants within RB/RA domains.
  • The R1 region, via β-sheet interactions, plays a central role in RAS recognition.
  • The R3 region contributes to the specificity of interactions between RAS and RRAS isoforms and their effectors.