Motion of a liquid bridge between nonparallel surfaces
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 10, 2026

The Preparation of Electrohydrodynamic Bridges from Polar Dielectric Liquids
Published on: September 30, 2014
Mohammadmehdi Ataei1, Tian Tang2, Alidad Amirfazli1
1Department of Mechanical Engineering, York University, Toronto, ON M3J 1P3, Canada.
Abstract:
Bulk motion of a liquid bridge between two nonparallel identical solid surfaces undergoing multiple loading cycles (compressing and stretching) was investigated numerically and experimentally. The effects of the following governing parameters were studied: the dihedral angle between the two surfaces (ψ), the amount of compressing and stretching (Δh), and wettability parameters i.e. the advancing contact angle (θa) and Contact Angle Hysteresis (CAH). Experiments were done using various combinations of ψ, Δh and on surfaces with different wettabilities to understand the effect of each parameter individually. Additionally, a numerical model using Surface Evolver software was developed to augment the experimental data and extract information about the shape of the bridge. An empirical function was proposed and validated to calculate the minimum amount of Δh needed to initiate the bulk motion (i.e. to overcome the initial lag of the motion in response to the compressing of the bridge), at a given dihedral angle ψ. The effect of governing parameters on magnitude and precision of the motion was investigated. The magnitude of the motion was found to be increased by increasing ψ and Δh, and/or by decreasing θa and CAH. We demonstrated the possibility of modulating the precision of the motion with θa. Additionally, it was shown that the magnitude of the motion (in one loading cycle) increases after each loading cycle, if the contact lines depin only on the narrower side of the bridge during compressing and only on the wider side during stretching (asymmetric depinning). Whereas, depinning on both sides of the bridge (symmetric depinning) reduced the magnitude of bridge motion in each cycle under cyclic loading. A larger ψ was found to convert symmetric depinning into asymmetric depinning. These findings not only enhance the understanding of bridge motion between nonparallel surfaces, but also are beneficial in controlling magnitude, precision, and lag of the motion in practical applications.
Related Concept Videos
Steady, Laminar Flow Between Parallel Plates
Surface Tension of Fluid
Surface tension varies...
Viscosity
The SI unit of viscosity is...
Surface Tension, Capillary Action, and Viscosity
The various IMFs between identical molecules of a substance are examples of cohesive forces. The molecules within a liquid are surrounded by other molecules and are attracted equally in all directions by the cohesive forces within the liquid. However, the molecules on the surface of a liquid are attracted only by about one-half as many molecules. Because of the unbalanced molecular attractions on the surface molecules, liquids contract to form a shape that minimizes the number...
Capillarity in Fluid
Surface tension is crucial to capillarity. It results from cohesive forces between liquid molecules at the liquid-air boundary, forming a skin that resists external forces. When the capillary tube...
Accelerating Fluids
The motion of the liquid within this infinitesimal cylinder is considered to obtain the pressure difference. Three vertical forces act on this liquid:

