Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Defect Size and Infant Morbidity at Discharge

Luke R Putnam1, Matthew T Harting2, Kuojen Tsao1

  • 1McGovern Medical School at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston and Children's Memorial Hermann Hospital, Houston, Texas.

Pediatrics
|December 13, 2016
PubMed

Insights

Infants with congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) and larger defect sizes experience more significant pulmonary, neurologic, and gastrointestinal issues. Defect size is the most reliable predictor of a patient's hospital course and overall disease burden at discharge.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Surgery
  • Neonatology
  • Critical Care Medicine

Background:

  • Congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) survival has improved, but significant morbidity persists.
  • Larger CDH defect sizes are linked to increased mortality, yet their association with morbidity is less understood.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the relationship between CDH defect size and pulmonary, neurologic, and gastrointestinal morbidity at hospital discharge.

Main Methods:

  • An international, prospective cohort study analyzed 3665 infants with CDH.
  • Data included demographics, intraoperative defect size, and clinical outcomes.
  • Morbidity at discharge was defined by oxygen requirement, neurologic findings, reflux, nutrition, or related medications.

Main Results:

  • Overall survival was 70.9%; 84% of survivors were discharged.
  • 74.2% of discharged infants had at least one morbidity (pulmonary, neurologic, or gastrointestinal).
  • Defect size was the strongest predictor of overall morbidity, length of stay, and ventilation duration.

Conclusions:

  • Infants with CDH frequently have multiple morbidities at discharge.
  • Congenital diaphragmatic hernia defect size is the most reliable indicator of hospital course and discharge morbidity burden.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos