Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 10, 2026
07:33
A Mouse Model of Intestinal Partial Obstruction
Published on: March 5, 2018
22.8K
Massive Small Bowel Infaction: A Comparison of Two Cases
James B Haddow1, Ilyas Arshad1, Andrew Redfern1
1Colorectal Unit, Pilgrim Hospital, Boston, Lincolnshire, UK.
Gastroenterology Research
|December 13, 2016
Summary
This study highlights the benefits of staged damage control surgery for massive small bowel infarction. A two-stage surgical approach leads to faster recovery and fewer complications in patients with bowel necrosis.
Area of Science:
- Gastroenterology
- Surgical Innovation
- Abdominal Surgery
Background:
- Massive small bowel infarction presents complex surgical challenges.
- Traditional approaches may lead to significant morbidity.
Observation:
- Two similar cases of massive small bowel infarction were analyzed.
- Two distinct surgical strategies were compared.
Findings:
- A staged damage control surgery approach involves initial bowel resection and temporary closure, followed by re-establishment of bowel continuity 48-72 hours later.
- This staged method demonstrated advantages over alternative approaches.
Implications:
- The staged damage control surgery approach is advocated for improved patient outcomes in small bowel infarction.
- This surgical strategy may reduce recovery time and complication rates.
