Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 10, 2026
Author Spotlight: Advancements in Refractive Surgical Correction for Presbyopia and Exploring Postoperative Visual Acuity
Published on: September 20, 2024
Single-step transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy in myopia and astigmatism: 18-month follow-up
Soheil Adib-Moghaddam1, Saeed Soleyman-Jahi1, Bahram Salmanian1
1From the Bina Eye Hospital (Adib-Moghaddam, Soleyman-Jahi, Salmanian, Omidvari, Adili-Aghdam, Noorizadeh), theTransPRK Research Center (Adib-Moghaddam, Soleyman-Jahi, Salmanian, Omidvari, Adili-Aghdam, Noorizadeh), and the Universal Council of Ophthalmology (Adib-Moghaddam, Soleyman-Jahi, Salmanian, Omidvari, Adili-Aghdam, Noorizadeh), Universal Scientific Education and Research Network, Tehran, Iran; the Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences (Eslani), University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Purpose:
To evaluate the long-term quantitative and qualitative optical outcomes of 1-step transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) to correct myopia and astigmatism.
Setting:
Bina Eye Hospital, Tehran, Iran.
Design:
Prospective interventional case series.
Methods:
Eyes with myopia with or without astigmatism were evaluated. One-step transepithelial PRK was performed with an aberration-free aspheric optimized profile and the Amaris 500 laser. Eighteen-month follow-up results for refraction, visual acuities, vector analysis, higher-order aberrations, contrast sensitivity, postoperative pain, and haze grade were assessed.
Results:
The study enrolled 146 eyes (74 patients). At the end of follow-up, 93.84% of eyes had an uncorrected distance visual acuity of 20/20 or better and 97.94% of eyes were within ±0.5 diopter of the targeted spherical refraction. On vector analysis, the mean correction index value was close to 1 and the mean index of success and magnitude of error values were close to 0. The achieved correction vector was on an axis counterclockwise to the axis of the intended correction. Photopic and mesopic contrast sensitivities and ocular and corneal spherical, cylindrical, and corneal coma aberrations significantly improved (all P < .001). A slight amount of trefoil aberration was induced (P < .001, ocular aberration; P < .01, corneal aberration). No eye lost more than 1 line of corrected distance visual acuity. No eye had a haze grade of 2+ degrees or higher throughout the follow-up.
Conclusions:
Eighteen-month results indicate the efficacy and safety of transepithelial PRK to correct myopia and astigmatism. It improved refraction and quality of vision.
Financial Disclosure:
None of the authors has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.
