Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model01:29

Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model

377
The Self-Evaluation Maintenance (SEM) model offers a psychological framework to understand how individuals’ self-esteem is influenced by the achievements of others, particularly those with whom they share close personal bonds. The SEM model operates when personal rather than social identity guides individuals. Central to this model is the notion that individuals have an inherent desire to preserve a favorable self-image, which is continuously shaped by interpersonal comparisons and...
377
Halo Effect01:27

Halo Effect

584
The halo effect is a cognitive bias in which an individual's overall impression influences judgments about their specific traits. This psychological phenomenon leads people to associate positive characteristics with those they perceive as generally good and negative characteristics with those they view as bad. This effect is particularly influential in social perception, professional evaluations, and decision-making processes.The Psychological Basis of the Halo EffectThe halo effect is rooted...
584
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification03:00

Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification

5.8K
Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...
5.8K
Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

7.1K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
7.1K
Types of Selection01:46

Types of Selection

46.0K
Natural selection influences the frequencies of particular alleles and phenotypes within populations in several different ways. Primarily, natural selection can be directional, stabilizing, or disruptive. Directional selection favors one extreme trait and shifts the population towards that phenotype while selecting against individuals displaying alternate traits. Stabilizing selection favors an intermediate trait with a narrow range of variation. Deviation from the optimal phenotype towards an...
46.0K
Reliability and Validity01:29

Reliability and Validity

14.2K
Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
14.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The ubiquity of countertransferential and other personal responses in progression deliberations.

The International journal of psycho-analysis·2025
Same author

Supervisory countertransferences and impingements in evaluating readiness for graduation: Always present, routinely under-recognized.

The International journal of psycho-analysis·2016
Same author

Developing psychoanalytic cases and the candidates who will analyze them: an educational initiative.

Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association·2010
Same author

Abortion: a dyadic perspective.

The American journal of orthopsychiatry·1977

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 10, 2026

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
07:35

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

Published on: October 11, 2018

8.1K

Fostering the educational value of candidate evaluation.

Arden Rothstein1

  • 1275 Central Park West, 1C, New York, NY, 10024, USA.

The International Journal of Psycho-Analysis
|December 15, 2016
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces four practices to enhance psychoanalytic training evaluations, improving the candidate experience and minimizing bias. These methods foster a stronger psychoanalytic attitude and collaborative learning environment.

Keywords:
candidate evaluationcandidatescountertransferenceeducationevaluationgraduationimmersionprogressionprogression countertransferencepsychoanalytic attitudepsychoanalytic competenciespsychoanalytic processpsychoanalytic trainingsupervisory countertransferencesupervisory evaluation

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 10, 2026

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
07:35

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

Published on: October 11, 2018

8.1K

Area of Science:

  • Psychoanalytic Education
  • Psychology
  • Psychotherapy Training

Background:

  • Candidate evaluation in psychoanalytic training presents unique intra-psychic and learning complexities.
  • Traditional evaluation methods can be sensitive to candidates' experiences and introduce evaluator bias.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present and evaluate four integrated practices for enhancing the educational value of psychoanalytic candidate evaluations.
  • To improve the psychoanalytic training process by addressing candidate sensitivities and minimizing personal biases in assessment.

Main Methods:

  • Defined criteria for clinical immersion focusing on analytic process development and competencies.
  • Mandated institute-wide assessment guidelines for progression/graduation, clearly communicated to all.
  • Ensured transparent and timely communication between candidates, supervisors, and advisors.
  • Implemented systematic, in-depth progression reviews with consultative checks and balances.

Main Results:

  • The four practices, when applied together, create a more considered evaluative process.
  • The enhanced process better promotes a psychoanalytic attitude among candidates.
  • Minimizes the intrusion of evaluators' personal responses into the assessment.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed four-practice model significantly improves the educational impact of psychoanalytic candidate evaluation.
  • This systematic approach fosters collaboration, transparency, and professional development in psychoanalytic training.
  • Case study illustrates the successful implementation and positive educational outcomes of these practices.